Singapore Film Festival keeps 'The Assassin(s)' as opener despite South Korean PPP demand
The Singapore International Film Festival says Hur Jin-ho's 'The Assassin(s)' will remain its opening film, a day after South Korea's People Power Party asked it to withdraw the film over alleged historical distortion.
1 / 2
The story, neutrally told
Mixed · 2The Singapore International Film Festival (SGIFF) is keeping Hur Jin-ho's South Korean thriller "The Assassin(s)" as the opening film of its 37th edition, which runs from Oct 21 to Nov 1. CNAN “would retain it as the opening title of its 37th edition, which runs from Oct 21 to Nov 1.” Read at CNA ↗ VarietyLC “is keeping Hur Jin-ho‘s “The Assassin(s)” as its opening film” Read at Variety ↗ Mixed · 2The decision followed a letter sent on Tuesday (Oct 6) to SGIFF executive director Jeremy Chua in the names of all 109 People Power Party (PPP) lawmakers, which expressed "deep regret" at the choice and urged the festival to reverse it immediately. VarietyLC “a day after all 109 lawmakers of South Korea’s conservative People Power Party (PPP) asked the festival to pull it.” Read at Variety ↗ CNAN “We express deep regret over the choice of The Assassin(s) as the opening film, and urge you to reconsider this decision immediately,” Read at CNA ↗ Left · 1Variety reports the letter was sent under the name of floor leader Jeong Jeom-sik. It argued that the film distorts history by leaving room to read then-President Park Chung-hee as linked to the killing of his wife, and it cited a survey of 1,017 adults in which 58.2% called the film a distortion of history and 27.6% saw it as creative freedom. VarietyLC “The PPP letter, sent Tuesday under the name of floor leader Jeong Jeom-sik”“The letter cited a survey of 1,017 adults in which 58.2% called the film a distortion of history and 27.6% considered it a matter of creative freedom.” Read at Variety ↗
Mixed · 2The letter said the party respects artistic freedom and festival independence but that "creative freedom does not mean freedom from responsibility regarding historical facts", and that opening an international festival with the film carries particular significance. CNAN “creative freedom does not mean freedom from responsibility regarding historical facts.” Read at CNA ↗ VarietyLC “Jeong wrote that the party respects artistic freedom and festival independence” Read at Variety ↗ Mixed · 2SGIFF's statement did not mention the PPP. It said only that it was aware of the debate, that the film was chosen through an independent curatorial process "for its artistic merit and contribution to contemporary Asian cinema", and that the filmmakers describe it as an imagined work mixing real events with fictional characters, not made to settle history, distort facts or serve a political purpose. VarietyLC “The festival made no mention of the PPP in a statement issued Wednesday, saying only that it was aware of the debate surrounding the film.” Read at Variety ↗ CNAN “It was not made to establish historical conclusions, distort facts, or serve any political purpose.” Read at CNA ↗ Mixed · 2The festival also pointed to the film's reception at home, about 2.5 million admissions since it opened in Korea on Sept 23; Variety adds it cited Korean Film Council data and seat occupancy of around 47% over the Chuseok holiday. VarietyLC “It also cited Korean Film Council data showing the film has passed roughly 2.5 million admissions at home and posted seat occupancy of around 47% over the Chuseok holiday.” Read at Variety ↗ CNAN “it had attracted approximately 2.5 million viewers since opening in cinemas on Sep 23.” Read at CNA ↗
Mixed · 2The film is set around the Aug 15, 1974 shooting at a Liberation Day ceremony in Seoul, in which Yuk Young-soo, wife of President Park Chung-hee, was killed. The official inquiry blamed gunman Mun Se-gwang, who it said acted on North Korean-linked instructions; the film declines to name a culprit, and CNA says it raises questions about possible involvement of Park and intelligence officials, while Variety says detractors argue its open ending points to Park or his government. VarietyLC “Hur’s film declines to name a culprit, and its detractors argue the open ending points to Park or his government.” Read at Variety ↗ CNAN “the film raises questions about the possible involvement of the former president and South Korean intelligence officials in the incident.” Read at CNA ↗ Left · 1The producers said in a Sept 28 statement that no specific individual is defined as being behind the incident in the film and that its hypotheses are not presented as historical fact. VarietyLC “Nowhere in the film is any specific individual defined as being behind the incident, and the film’s hypotheses and dramatic settings are not presented as historical fact.” Read at Variety ↗ Mixed · 2The backlash in South Korea has gone beyond the festival request. About 50 conservative protesters gathered outside lead actor Yoo Hae-jin's home on Oct 4 (as reported by The Korea Times, per CNA), and police placed Yoo under protective measures on Oct 6, including an emergency smartwatch and extra patrols. A conservative group said it would picket his home daily until the end of the month. CNAN “On Oct 6, South Korean police confirmed that Yoo had been placed under protective measures following the protests and threats.” Read at CNA ↗ VarietyLC “a conservative group also said it would picket actor Yoo Hae-jin’s home every day until the end of the month.” Read at Variety ↗
Mixed · 2The Busan International Film Festival cancelled a career conversation with Lee Min-ho on Oct 1, and distributor Hive Media Corp. withdrew cast and crew from Busan appearances on safety grounds. VarietyLC “On Oct. 1, the Busan International Film Festival (BIFF) called off “Actors House: Lee Min-ho,”” Read at Variety ↗ CNAN “cast members would withdraw from events at the Busan International Film Festival, citing concerns over the safety of audiences and attendees.” Read at CNA ↗ Mixed · 2Industry bodies including the Producers Guild, Cinematographers Guild and Directors Guild of Korea have defended the filmmakers and criticised pressure on those who worked on the film; CNA reports a coalition of 19 industry organisations did so. Culture Minister Chae Hwi-young condemned threats against the cast and crew and said at an Oct 7 parliamentary audit that government should not intervene in the content of artistic works. VarietyLC “The Directors Guild of Korea (DGK) has also come to the defense of the filmmakers” Read at Variety ↗ CNAN “There should be no restrictions on imagination and creative work,” Read at CNA ↗ Left · 1Variety also reports that a former PPP Seoul city councilor, Lee Jong-bae, asked police to investigate Hur, Hive Media CEO Kim Won-kuk and writers Kwon Ki-jun and Lee Ji-min for defamation, and that PPP lawmakers' attempt to summon Hur to a parliamentary audit was blocked by the Democratic Party. VarietyLC “has asked Seoul police to investigate Hur, Hive Media Corp. CEO Kim Won-kuk and writers Kwon Ki-jun and Lee Ji-min for defamation.” Read at Variety ↗
Mixed · 2The film premiered at the Toronto International Film Festival in September. It is due to open SGIFF on Oct 21 at the Sands Theatre, Marina Bay Sands, with a second screening on Oct 22 at the National Museum of Singapore; Hur and cast members Shim Eun-kyung and Park Sung-hoon are expected to attend. CNAN “The Assassin(s) is scheduled to open SGIFF on Oct 21 at the Sands Theatre at Marina Bay Sands, with another screening on Oct 22 at the National Museum of Singapore.” Read at CNA ↗ VarietyLC “Hur is due to attend with cast members Shim Eun-kyung and Park Sung-hoon.” Read at Variety ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left1 outlet
- Framing
- Variety leads with the festival standing by the film after the PPP demand, and gives detail on the domestic fallout and defence by Korean film guilds.
- Emphasis
- The PPP letter's arguments and survey figures, Busan cancellations, guild statements on threats to crew, defamation complaint and the blocked parliamentary summons.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Does not report the police protection for Yoo Hae-jin or the culture minister's remarks.
- Charged language
- “Korean Conservatives”
Centre1 outlet
- Framing
- CNA, a Singapore outlet, frames it as SGIFF standing by the film despite controversy, based on the festival's reply to its queries, with local screening details.
- Emphasis
- SGIFF's full statement, the PPP open letter, safety measures for Yoo Hae-jin, the culture minister's defence of creative freedom and Singapore ticketing details.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Omits the PPP survey figures, the defamation complaint and the blocked parliamentary summons.
- Charged language
- “historical distortion”
Right0 outlets
No right outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
What every side reports
- SGIFF is keeping 'The Assassin(s)' as its Oct 21 opening film.
- The People Power Party's 109 lawmakers wrote to SGIFF executive director Jeremy Chua on Oct 6 asking it to reconsider.
- SGIFF cited its independent curatorial process, artistic merit and the filmmakers' description of the film as imaginative fiction.
- The film has drawn about 2.5 million admissions in South Korea since opening on Sept 23.
- Lead actor Yoo Hae-jin has faced protests, and Busan festival appearances by cast and crew were cancelled or withdrawn.
Where accounts differ
-
Whether the film distorts history
- Left
- Variety relays the PPP's claim of distortion and the filmmakers' denial of any intent to misrepresent facts; it notes detractors say the open ending points to Park.
- Centre
- CNA says conservatives argue the film unfairly implicates Park and misrepresents an established account, while SGIFF and the filmmakers say it is a creative work not meant to distort facts.
- Right
- No right-leaning outlet covered the story.
Singapore International Film Festival organisation
Says the film was chosen through an independent curatorial process for artistic merit, presents it as a creative work and does not mention the PPP.
“The film was selected through SGIFF’s independent curatorial process for its artistic merit and contribution to contemporary Asian cinema,”” — Variety
“SGIFF presents the film in that context, as a creative work.” — CNA
People Power Party party
Says it respects artistic freedom but that the film distorts history, and that an opening gala could spread that damage overseas; it urges immediate reversal.
“urged the festival to reverse it immediately” — Variety
“urging the festival to reconsider its opening film selection.” — CNA
Left1 article
-
Singapore Film Festival Stands by ‘The Assassin(s)’ After Korean Conservatives Demand It Be Dropped
Neutral Reports the festival's refusal and the PPP's arguments in detail, alongside the film industry's defence of the crew.

Centre1 article
-
CNAN ·
Neutral Presents SGIFF's response and the Korean controversy with attributed sourcing and local event details.

Right0 articles
No coverage yet.
- 7 Oct 09:25 First VarietyLC Singapore Film Festival Stands by ‘The Assassin(s)’ After Korean Conservatives Demand It Be Dropped
- 8 Oct 05:31 +20h 6m CNAN SGIFF stands by The Assassin(s) as festival opening film despite controversy and calls for withdrawal
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.