Skip to content
Bramble

World

South Africa lodges third diplomatic protest against US Ambassador Bozell

South Africa's foreign ministry formally protested to US Ambassador Leo Brent Bozell III for a third time. Accounts differ on whether the conduct was specified: Reuters says it was not, while Anadolu cites News24 tying it to his media criticism of the government.

2 outlets · 0L · 1C · 1R First reported Account updated
Image: The Straits Times
Image: Anadolu Agency

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

South Africa's foreign affairs ministry delivered a demarche, a formal diplomatic protest, to US Ambassador Leo Brent Bozell III on Tuesday, 29 September. A senior official at the Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO) told Reuters it was the third demarche since Bozell began his duties nine months ago, over what it called "undiplomatic conduct", without saying what the conduct was. Anadolu, citing News24 and unidentified sources, reported that the protest followed Bozell's criticism of the government in media interviews, including repeated accusations that President Cyril Ramaphosa had failed to address five White House demands.

Reuters said Bozell had recently taken a firmer tone in local interviews, saying Pretoria had not adequately addressed Washington's concerns and that further pressure could follow. Bozell, a conservative activist and writer, arrived in Pretoria in February; the first summons came over remarks that DIRCO said undermined South Africa's judiciary and historical context, and Anadolu ties it to his comments on the "Kill the Boer" chant in March. Both reports place this within worsening relations, including US visa restrictions on South Africans announced about two weeks earlier; Anadolu says Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced them.

Pretoria says its policies address apartheid-era inequality and that its sovereignty must be respected, while remaining open to talks; the DIRCO official said both sides are committed to resolving outstanding matters. The US embassy did not immediately respond to Reuters, and the State Department said it would reply later.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on.

Left0 outlets

No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Centre1 outlet

Framing
Presents the protest as a response to the ambassador's media criticism of the government, and sets out the five US demands behind the tensions.
Emphasis
The US demands (Black economic empowerment exemptions, land expropriation, the chant, farm killings, refugee programme) and Rubio's visa restrictions.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not include the DIRCO official's on-record statement about ongoing talks or the US embassy's non-response.
Charged language
“controversial”
For example
“South Africa lodged a diplomatic protest with the US ambassador to Pretoria after he criticized the government in media interviews” — Anadolu Agency
“The US is seeking exemptions for American companies from Black economic empowerment rules” — Anadolu Agency

Right1 outlet

Framing
Reuters copy run by the Straits Times leads with the official's confirmation of a third demarche and notes the conduct was not specified.
Emphasis
The on-record DIRCO comment, the US non-response, and background on Trump's claims about white South Africans and inequality.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not list the five US demands.
Charged language
“false claims”
For example
“a senior government official told Reuters, but did not elaborate on what the conduct was” — The Straits Times
“Trump's repeated false claims that white South Africans face systemic persecution” — The Straits Times