Study finds abrupt 'cliff-like' menopause changes; Australian experts urge caution
A Nature Medicine study of over a million women in the US and Israel reports sudden, step-like changes in many body systems at menopause. Australian experts quoted by the ABC question the "cliff" framing and the study's design.
1 / 2
The story, neutrally told
Left · 2A study published in Nature Medicine reports that menopause-related biological changes across multiple body systems are sudden and "cliff-like" rather than gradual. ABC News (Australia)LC “A new study, in Nature Medicine today, suggests the biological changes across multiple body systems are not gradual, but sudden and "cliff-like".” Read at ABC News (Australia) ↗ Scientific AmericanLC “In a recent study published in Nature Medicine, researchers analyzed health data from more than one million women in the U.S. and Israel” Read at Scientific American ↗ Left · 1Researchers analysed more than 300 million laboratory tests from more than 1 million women in the United States and Israel between 1999 and 2024. ABC News (Australia)LC “researchers analysed more than 300 million laboratory tests from more than 1 million women in the United States and Israel between 1999 and 2024.” Read at ABC News (Australia) ↗ Left · 1The senior author, Uri Alon of Israel's Weizmann Institute of Science, says the data show an abrupt, body-wide transition across bone, liver, kidney, blood chemistry and blood fats; some changes, such as iron and haemoglobin, were positive, likely because monthly bleeding stops. Scientific AmericanLC ““Menopause is not a slow part of aging. It’s an abrupt, body-wide transition across bone, liver, kidney, blood chemistry, fats, and more,””“Some of these leaps were positive—such as for iron and hemoglobin levels, likely because monthly bleeding stops, Alon says.” Read at Scientific American ↗
Left · 2Alon says his team tested the finding: applying the method to men of the same age distribution showed no jumps, and records from the US and Israel showed similar patterns. Scientific AmericanLC ““We ran it on men with the same age distribution and saw no jumps,” he says.” Read at Scientific American ↗ ABC News (Australia)LC “We verified the [cliff] is real because applying our approach to men showed no cliff, and we also tested it using a vast range of simulated data” Read at ABC News (Australia) ↗ Left · 1The finding challenges earlier work such as the US Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN), which suggests the changes are gradual, over about three years; Alon says his method of aligning data at the final menstrual period allowed more data and more advanced analysis. ABC News (Australia)LC “Highly respected studies, such as the long-running US Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN), suggests these all-body changes are gradual, happening over about three years.”“Our study used a mathematical approach to align large-scale data at the final menstrual period, and therefore had more data and more advanced analysis than SWAN,” Read at ABC News (Australia) ↗ Left · 1Martha Hickey, head of menopause services at The Women's Hospital Victoria, who was not involved, called the "cliff-like" claim "unnecessarily alarming" and said "physiological cliff" is not a scientific or medical term; she also called retrospective studies "poor quality" for this question. ABC News (Australia)LC “described the claim of "cliff-like" changes across multiple body systems as "unnecessarily alarming" for women.”“Professor Hickey said retrospective studies were "poor quality" and were not designed to answer the question posed in this case.” Read at ABC News (Australia) ↗
Left · 1The ABC notes the study used existing data and relied on self-reported information about the last period, whereas SWAN was designed to follow women through the transition. Elina Safro of the Australasian Menopause Society said the "cliff" theory is not plausible. ABC News (Australia)LC “the new study used existing data and relied on self-reported information about a woman's last period.”“"My reading is that the 'cliff' theory is not plausible,"” Read at ABC News (Australia) ↗ Left · 1The Australian experts did highlight accelerated change in many body systems beginning about 15 years before menopause, which Safro said is about seven years earlier than SWAN indicated and underscores vigilance about midlife health. ABC News (Australia)LC “accelerated change across many of the body's systems began about 15 years prior to menopause.” Read at ABC News (Australia) ↗ Left · 2Women on menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) showed smaller jumps, especially in bone, liver and kidney tests, and Alon suggests some women might benefit from starting earlier, including bone density checks around age 40 or 45, on a physician's advice. Scientific AmericanLC “Women who were on hormone therapy tended to see smaller jumps in some tests, “especially in bone, liver and kidney,” Alon says.” Read at Scientific American ↗ ABC News (Australia)LC “this study would advocate checking around age 40 or 45 and then considering menopausal hormone therapy as prevention,” Read at ABC News (Australia) ↗
Left · 1Hickey said there is good evidence MHT can reduce osteoporosis and fracture risk but none that it prevents cardiovascular disease or dementia, and that healthier women are more likely to use MHT, so the groups may have differed beforehand. ABC News (Australia)LC “there was no evidence to suggest it would help prevent chronic conditions such as cardiovascular disease and dementia.”“healthier women were more likely to use MHT” Read at ABC News (Australia) ↗ Left · 2Ada Cheung, a University of Melbourne endocrinologist, said the study shows "health checks matter around menopause" and recommended women talk to a GP in their 40s. All four experts quoted by the ABC agreed more research is needed, and Alon said his team plans a clinical trial of MHT taken before menopause; Scientific American says it remains unclear why the jumps occur. ABC News (Australia)LC “All four experts agreed more research was needed.”“Professor Alon said his team were planning a clinical trial to evaluate outcomes for people who took MHT before their period ended” Read at ABC News (Australia) ↗ Scientific AmericanLC “Certain health markers seem to “jump” during menopause, according to a new study, but it’s unclear why” Read at Scientific American ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left2 outlets
- Framing
- Both outlets lead on the Nature Medicine finding. The ABC frames it through local expert scepticism and practical advice for women; Scientific American presents the finding largely through the lead author, with a tentative 'hints at' framing.
- Emphasis
- ABC: study limitations, midlife health checks, hormone therapy evidence. Scientific American: Alon's explanation, the male control, and hormone therapy.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Scientific American quotes no independent experts and does not mention the SWAN comparison or the study's retrospective, self-reported design. The ABC gives little detail on individual markers.
- Charged language
- “unnecessarily alarming”“cliff-like”
- For example
-
“Australian experts are urging caution saying the study has a number of limitations and more research is needed.” — ABC News (Australia)
“Now new research raises questions about a “physiological cliff” at menopause.” — Scientific American
Centre0 outlets
No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Right0 outlets
No right outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
What every side reports
- The study was published in Nature Medicine and analysed health data from more than one million women in the US and Israel.
- Senior author Uri Alon of the Weizmann Institute describes the changes as abrupt; men showed no such jumps.
- Women on hormone therapy showed smaller jumps, and more research is needed.
Where accounts differ
-
Whether menopause changes are truly 'cliff-like'
- Left
- ABC: Australian experts call the framing unnecessarily alarming and the theory implausible, citing retrospective design and self-reported data. Scientific American: reports the 'cliff' with Alon's account and says it 'hints' at it, without outside experts, noting the cause is unclear.
Oceania1 outlet
The ABC centres Australian clinicians who question the study.
“But Australian experts urge caution interpreting the results.” — ABC News (Australia)
ABC News (Australia)
North America1 outlet
Scientific American relays the study's findings from its lead author without outside critique.
““We ran it on men with the same age distribution and saw no jumps,” he says.” — Scientific American
Scientific American
Left2 articles
-
Is there a 'cliff-like' decline at menopause? Australian experts skeptical
Mixed Explains the study then foregrounds Australian experts' scepticism and practical health advice.
-
What happens to the body during menopause? New research hints at a biological ‘cliff’
Neutral Reports the finding mainly via the lead author, hedged as a hint with the cause unclear.

Centre0 articles
No coverage yet.
Right0 articles
No coverage yet.
- 12 Oct 16:00 First ABC News (Australia)LC Is there a 'cliff-like' decline at menopause? Australian experts skeptical
- 13 Oct 15:35 +23h 35m Scientific AmericanLC What happens to the body during menopause? New research hints at a biological ‘cliff’
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.
Ask about this story
Loading…