Sunday Times: about 800 Scottish public sector staff paid £27m a year without permanent roles
A Sunday Times investigation found around 800 Scottish public sector employees on redeployment lists, costing about £27m a year, under a no-compulsory-redundancy policy. The Scottish Government says the policy continues and staff must do appropriate work.
1 / 2
The story, neutrally told
Right · 1A Sunday Times investigation found that around 800 Scottish public sector staff are receiving full salaries, totalling about £27 million a year, while having no permanent roles. GB NewsR “Around 800 Scottish public sector staff members are receiving full salaries totalling £27million annually whilst having no permanent roles to fulfil, an investigation has found.” Read at GB News ↗ Right · 1The workers are in the NHS, local councils and government quangos, and remain employed although their positions no longer exist. GB NewsR “workers across the National Health Service, local councils and Government quangos who remain employed despite their positions no longer existing” Read at GB News ↗ Right · 1The situation stems from a 2007 ban on compulsory redundancies in Scotland's public sector, introduced by the SNP; First Minister John Swinney has continued to back the policy while Scotland faces a projected £5billion deficit, according to GB News. GB NewsR “The situation stems from a 2007 prohibition on forced job losses within Scotland's public sector, which was introduced by the Scottish National Party.”“First Minister John Swinney has maintained support for this policy even as Scotland confronts a projected £5billion deficit.” Read at GB News ↗
Right · 2Affected staff are placed in redeployment pools while they wait for suitable alternative posts, generally on comparable pay and benefits to their previous jobs. GB NewsR “Those affected enter redeployment pools where they wait for suitable alternative positions, generally receiving comparable remuneration and benefits to their previous posts.” Read at GB News ↗ ReasonRC “any workers whose jobs become obsolete are kept on "redeployment" lists and allowed to remain on the payroll while waiting for suitable positions” Read at Reason ↗ Right · 2The most striking case is an NHS Highland employee who has received full pay and benefits for 17 years without a specific post; the board declined to say what the person did or their total pay. GB NewsR “The health board declined to disclose either the individual's activities during this period or their total compensation.” Read at GB News ↗ ReasonRC “One National Health Service employee has received a full salary and benefits for 17 years despite not having an actual job.” Read at Reason ↗ Right · 1NHS Highland has 88 staff in redeployment, 26 of whom have had no permanent role for at least five years. Across Scotland's public sector, 255 workers had been without fixed employment for more than 12 months, and 49 had received full pay for five years or more after their posts were made redundant. GB NewsR “NHS Highland currently has 88 staff members in redeployment, with 26 having lacked permanent roles for a minimum of five years.”“the investigation identified 255 workers without fixed employment for more than 12 months.”“An additional 49 individuals have received full salaries for five years or longer after their original positions became redundant.” Read at GB News ↗
Right · 1Police Scotland, Scottish Water and NHS 24 also reported keeping several employees without permanent posts for five years or more. GB NewsR “Police Scotland, Scottish Water and NHS 24 also reported retaining multiple employees without permanent posts for five years or more.” Read at GB News ↗ Right · 1Scotland's NHS spends about £1.4 million a month (£16.8 million a year) on such staff, based on data for 315 workers, with data on another 185 withheld; local authorities spend about £5.8 million a year. GB NewsR “Scotland's NHS spends £1.4million monthly, totalling £16.8million yearly, on employees lacking permanent positions, based on data covering 315 workers. Information regarding another 185 individuals was withheld.”“Scottish local authorities face annual expenses of £5.8million for retaining surplus employees” Read at GB News ↗ Right · 1Reason said the true cost is probably higher because several public bodies refused to disclose salary information for hundreds of the workers. ReasonRC “the actual cost to taxpayers is likely far higher, because several public bodies have refused to disclose salary information for hundreds of these workers” Read at Reason ↗
Right · 1Scottish Conservative finance spokesman Craig Hoy called it "a gravy train for insiders" and urged the Auditor General for Scotland to investigate. GB NewsR “The Scottish Conservatives have called for the Auditor General for Scotland to examine the findings as a public spending watchdog investigation.”“"The auditor-general must investigate this scandal and establish how taxpayers' money is being squandered on a system that has been allowed to spiral out of control."” Read at GB News ↗ Right · 1Alan Boyter, a former senior NHS HR director, accepted that redeployment pools can avoid redundancy costs and early pension liabilities, but called five-year waits "just poor management" and 17 years "outrageous", suggesting a two-year limit. GB NewsR “He characterised five-year waits as "just poor management" and described anything approaching 17 years as "outrageous and a serious management failure".”“"Staff should not be on redeployment registers for more than two years without having been made offers of suitable alternative jobs."” Read at GB News ↗ Right · 1The Scottish Government said its no-compulsory-redundancy policy remains in force and that organisations must ensure staff awaiting redeployment are "engaged in appropriate work for their pay scale"; NHS Highland said it follows national policy. GB NewsR “Public organisations must ensure employees awaiting redeployment remain "engaged in appropriate work for their pay scale", according to a Government spokesman.”“NHS Highland stated it adhered to national policies and remained "committed to supporting colleagues through periods of change".” Read at GB News ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left0 outlets
No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Centre0 outlets
No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Right2 outlets
- Framing
- Both outlets present the findings as taxpayer waste caused by an SNP policy; GB News leads with the SNP and Conservative criticism, Reason with a short wry item on paying people 'for nothing'.
- Emphasis
- The £27m cost, the 17-year NHS Highland case, Conservative calls for an Auditor General inquiry, and the possibility that the true cost is higher.
- Leaves out or plays down
- GB News gives the government's defence and Prof Boyter's acknowledgement that redeployment pools can make sense, but late in the piece; Reason omits the government's explanation of the policy's purpose. Neither includes a view from the SNP beyond the government spokesman.
- Charged language
- “zombie workers”“splurges”“eye-watering”“gravy train for insiders”“ghost workforce”“Money for Nothing”
- For example
-
“SNP splurges eye-watering £27MILLION of taxpayers' money on 'zombie workers' who do not even exist” — GB News
“a gravy train for insiders with a ghost workforce of hundreds costing taxpayers millions every month” — GB News
“The estimated cost of paying people to do nothing is £27 million ($36 million) per year” — Reason
What every side reports
- Around 800 Scottish public sector workers are on redeployment lists with no permanent role.
- The estimated cost is £27 million a year.
- One NHS employee has been paid in full for 17 years without a specific job.
- The cause is Scotland's policy against compulsory redundancy.
Where accounts differ
-
Whether the workers are idle or doing useful work
- Right
- GB News calls them 'zombie workers' who 'do not even exist' in its headline and quotes a Conservative describing a 'ghost workforce'; Reason says they are paid 'to do nothing'. The Scottish Government says staff must be engaged in appropriate work for their pay scale, and the article gives no evidence on what individuals actually do.
Scottish Government organisation
Says the no-compulsory-redundancies policy continues, that staff awaiting redeployment must be engaged in appropriate work for their pay scale, and that voluntary severance and other tools will feed into public service reform.
“The Scottish Government defended its position, stating its no-compulsory-redundancies policy continues in force.” — GB News
Scottish National Party party
Credited by GB News with introducing the 2007 ban on forced job losses that underlies the situation; no SNP statement beyond the government's is reported.
“The situation stems from a 2007 prohibition on forced job losses within Scotland's public sector, which was introduced by the Scottish National Party.” — GB News
The Sunday Times organisation
Its investigation is the source of the figures: about 800 staff, £27m a year, with a 17-year case at NHS Highland.
“The Sunday Times revealed workers across the National Health Service, local councils and Government quangos who remain employed despite their positions no longer existing.” — GB News
Left0 articles
No coverage yet.
Centre0 articles
No coverage yet.
Right2 articles
-
GB NewsR ·
SNP splurges eye-watering £27MILLION of taxpayers' money on 'zombie workers' who do not even exist
Alarmist Frames the Sunday Times findings as SNP waste, with a headline calling the staff 'zombie workers' who 'do not even exist', though the body says they are real employees awaiting redeployment.

-
ReasonRC ·
Dismissive Short Brickbat item treating the arrangement as paying people for nothing, noting costs are probably understated.

- 25 Oct 15:54 First GB NewsR SNP splurges eye-watering £27MILLION of taxpayers' money on 'zombie workers' who do not even exist
- 27 Oct 08:00 +40h 6m ReasonRC Brickbat: Money for Nothing
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.
Ask about this story
Loading…