Wellcome survey finds fewer Britons strongly trust science than in 2020
The Wellcome Global Monitor 2026 finds 51% of Britons trust science "a lot", down from 63% in 2020, and a global fall in at least some trust from 80% to 72%. Wellcome says the survey cannot show what caused the decline.
1 / 2
The story, neutrally told
Right · 1The Wellcome Global Monitor 2026, a survey commissioned by the medical research charity Wellcome, found that 51% of Britons say they trust science "a lot", down from 63% in 2020. GB NewsR “Only 51 per cent of Britons now say they trust science "a lot", compared with 63 per cent in 2020” Read at GB News ↗ Right · 1The UK data come from interviews with 1,007 people aged over 15 and are compared with surveys of about 1,000 people in 2018 and 2020. Strong trust in Britain rose from 53% in 2018 to 63% in 2020 before falling to 51% in 2025. GB NewsR “drawn from interviews with 1,007 people over 15 across Britain and compared with earlier surveys of 1,000 people in 2018 and 2020”“Strong trust in science actually rose from 53 per cent in 2018 to 63 per cent in 2020” Read at GB News ↗ Right · 2The UK results are part of a global study of 143,620 people in 140 countries, produced by Wellcome with Gallup and Ipsos. Worldwide, the share expressing at least some trust in science fell from 80% in 2020 to 72% in 2025; it had been 77% in 2018. GB NewsR “involving 143,620 people across 140 countries” Read at GB News ↗ The Straits TimesRC “72% of people expressed at least some trust in science in 2025, down from 80% in 2020 and 77% in 2018”“The survey, produced by Wellcome with Gallup and Ipsos” Read at The Straits Times ↗
Right · 1In Britain, 85% trust science "a lot" or "some". Six in ten say they trust doctors and nurses "a lot", against 34% for scientists and 14% for the national government, and 31% say they do not trust the government at all. GB NewsR “While 85 per cent of Britons trust science either "a lot" or "some", just 14 per cent express a lot of trust in the national government.”“Six in ten people in the UK say they trust doctors and nurses “a lot”, compared with 34 per cent for scientists and 14 per cent for the Government.” Read at GB News ↗ Right · 1Globally, strong trust in scientists rose to 43% during the pandemic from 34% in 2018, then fell to 32% in 2025, still ahead of trust in governments and journalists, according to Bloomberg's report. The Straits TimesRC “The proportion expressing a lot of trust in scientists rose to 43% during the pandemic from 34% in 2018, before falling to 32% in 2025.” Read at The Straits Times ↗ Right · 2Wellcome officials said the survey does not establish a cause. Mark Henderson of Wellcome said the research could not show whether the pandemic response was responsible, though he said uncertainty "was not always communicated very well" during Covid. Wellcome chief executive John-Arne Røttingen said the politicisation of science during the pandemic probably contributed. GB NewsR “But he stressed that the research could not establish whether the pandemic response was responsible for the fall in confidence.” Read at GB News ↗ The Straits TimesRC “The survey does not establish what caused the decline, though the politicisation of science during the pandemic probably contributed” Read at The Straits Times ↗
Right · 2The survey links trust to economic circumstances. Worldwide, 39% of people living comfortably trust science a lot, against 20% of those struggling financially. Strong trust among those struggling fell 16 percentage points from 2020 to 2025, against 10 points among those living comfortably. The Straits TimesRC “Strong trust fell 16 percentage points among those struggling financially between 2020 and 2025, compared with 10 points among those living comfortably.” Read at The Straits Times ↗ GB NewsR “39 per cent of people living comfortably trusted science "a lot", compared with just 20 per cent of those struggling financially” Read at GB News ↗ Right · 2Bloomberg adds that trust was lower in more unequal countries and where people had less confidence in institutions or saw more corruption, and was higher (43%) among people confident in their country's hospitals and clinics. The share worldwide who believe most people in their country benefit from science fell from 42% in 2018 to 37% in 2025. The Straits TimesRC “Countries with greater economic inequality also tended to have lower trust in science, as did places where people had less confidence in public institutions or perceived greater corruption.” Read at The Straits Times ↗ GB NewsR “In 2018, 42 per cent worldwide believed most people in their country benefited from science. By 2025, that had fallen to 37 per cent.” Read at GB News ↗ Right · 2On vaccines, 52% of Britons say they want a vaccine recommended by a doctor or nurse immediately, 39% prefer to think first and 10% do not get vaccinated. Globally the figures are 34%, 48% and 15%. Wellcome cautioned that other factors also shape vaccine decisions. GB NewsR “The survey also found that 52 per cent of Britons want to receive vaccines recommended by doctors or nurses immediately.” Read at GB News ↗ The Straits TimesRC “34% said they wanted it immediately, 48% preferred to think about it and 15% said they did not get vaccines at all” Read at The Straits Times ↗
Right · 2Henderson called the British fall "not a catastrophic drop" but a sign of fragility, and said "we don't want blind trust in science and sometimes mistrust is deserved". Røttingen said the decline should be kept in perspective, since about seven in ten people globally still trust science, but said he was worried about rising measles cases in the US and Europe. GB NewsR “"Although this is not a catastrophic drop, it is showing the fragility and the pressures around trust in science."”“"We don't want blind trust in science and sometimes mistrust is deserved,"” Read at GB News ↗ The Straits TimesRC “The decline needs to be kept in perspective, Røttingen said. About seven in 10 people globally still trust science.” Read at The Straits Times ↗ Right · 2GB News set the British result against debate over how governments handled Covid, citing a BMJ Open study of 328 UK adults in which people lost more trust in government advice when confident statements about vaccine effectiveness were later contradicted; that experiment used hypothetical announcements. Bloomberg stressed public-health consequences, citing almost 3,900 US measles cases this year, the worst outbreak in three decades. GB NewsR “The experiment used hypothetical government announcements rather than testing the impact of actual pandemic policies.” Read at GB News ↗ The Straits TimesRC “The US is experiencing its worst measles outbreak in three decades, with almost 3,900 cases this year” Read at The Straits Times ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left0 outlets
No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Centre0 outlets
No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Right2 outlets
- Framing
- GB News leads with the British decline and ties it to scrutiny of the Covid response. The Straits Times carries a Bloomberg report on the global findings, focused on inequality and public-health risks.
- Emphasis
- GB News stresses the gap between trust in science and trust in government, and communication of uncertainty. The Straits Times stresses financial hardship, vaccination and measles.
- Leaves out or plays down
- GB News gives less space to the global breakdown and to Røttingen's views. The Straits Times has no UK-specific figures. Neither outlet has a left or centre counterpart in this story.
- Charged language
- “plunges”“plummeted”“follow the science”
- For example
-
“Britain's trust in science has plummeted with a major new survey revealing a 12-percentage-point fall in strong public confidence in just five years.” — GB News
“The Covid-era surge in public trust in science has largely faded, with the steepest drop among people struggling financially” — The Straits Times
What every side reports
- Wellcome's survey shows strong trust in science has fallen since 2020.
- Worldwide, the share with at least some trust in science fell from 80% in 2020 to 72% in 2025.
- The survey cannot establish what caused the fall.
- Poorer financial circumstances are linked to lower trust.
Where accounts differ
-
What the fall says about the Covid response
- Right
- GB News says the decline raises "fresh questions about the lasting impact of the Covid response", then notes the Wellcome figures suggest it cannot simply be blamed on it. The Straits Times (Bloomberg) quotes Røttingen saying the politicisation of science probably contributed.
UK and Ireland1 outlet
GB News focuses on British figures and Covid-policy debate.
“The decline raises fresh questions about the lasting impact of the Covid response” — GB News
GB News
East and Southeast Asia1 outlet
The Straits Times runs Bloomberg's global, public-health-focused account with US examples.
“The retreat has potentially far-reaching consequences for public health as vaccination rates decline and preventable diseases resurge.” — The Straits Times
The Straits Times
Left0 articles
No coverage yet.
Centre0 articles
No coverage yet.
Right2 articles
-
GB NewsR ·
Britain's trust in science plunges as Covid response comes under scrutiny
Alarmist Presents the 12-point fall as a plunge and links it to Covid-response scrutiny, while including Wellcome's caveat that cause is unproven.

-
The Straits TimesRC · · via Bloomberg
Trust in science falls as Covid-era confidence fades, global survey finds
Neutral Bloomberg wire copy on the global survey, covering inequality, vaccination and a call to keep the decline in perspective.
- 11 Oct 00:01 First GB NewsR Britain's trust in science plunges as Covid response comes under scrutiny
- 11 Oct 03:09 +3h 8m The Straits TimesRC Trust in science falls as Covid-era confidence fades, global survey finds via Bloomberg
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.