Skip to content
Bramble

US

Honan poll: Jewish New Yorkers report far greater impact from Oct. 7 and more safety fears

A Honan Strategy Group survey of 1,167 likely New York voters, including 503 Jewish respondents, found Jewish voters much more affected by Oct. 7 and its aftermath than non-Jewish voters, and about half saying Jewish New Yorkers are unsafe.

2 outlets · 0L · 0C · 2R First reported Account updated
Image: JNS
Image: New York Post

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

Right · 2Honan Strategy Group surveyed 1,167 likely voters between Oct. 2 and 6, 2026, three years after the Oct. 7, 2023 Hamas attack on Israel. Right · 2The sample included 503 self-identified Jewish respondents, an oversample; JNS says the firm oversampled people with Jewish-sounding names. Right · 1JNS reports that 78% of Jewish likely voters said Oct. 7 and its aftermath affected them a lot, against 32% of non-Jewish voters; 11% of Jewish respondents said it affected them not very much or not at all, versus 42% of non-Jewish respondents.

Right · 1Some 68% of Jewish respondents said the world has moved on from the victims of Oct. 7, while 28% said it remembers them; non-Jewish voters split 45% remembers and 42% moved on. Right · 1On social strain, 66% of Jewish respondents said disagreements about Israel have strained relationships with family, friends or coworkers (23% 'a great deal'), compared with 34% of non-Jewish respondents. Right · 1Views of the city differed little by group on division: 45% of Jewish and 48% of non-Jewish voters saw a more divided New York City than before Oct. 7, while 1% of Jewish and 23% of non-Jewish voters saw a more united one.

Right · 1Nearly all Jewish respondents (99%) said they followed the war against Hamas closely or very closely, versus 34% of non-Jewish voters. Right · 1The New York Post, which focused on safety, reported that 51% of Jewish voters said Jewish New Yorkers are unsafe today, versus 38% of non-Jewish voters, and 55% said it has gotten worse since Oct. 7; 47% said they felt safe. Right · 1According to the Post, 42% of Jewish respondents said they had been verbally harassed for being Jewish, 59% said public protests are unsafe for them (double the non-Jewish share), and half said wearing a kippah or Star of David is unsafe.

Right · 1The Post also reported that one in four Jewish voters hid their Jewish identity online or at work, 36% stopped wearing Jewish symbols, 40% called college campuses unsafe for Jews, and one in three witnessed or experienced an antisemitic incident in the five boroughs in the past year, versus 12% of non-Jewish voters. Right · 2Bradley Honan of Honan Strategy Group said the aim is to open policymakers' eyes to public opinion and prompt civic and business leaders to enact policies; he called the city 'fairly divided' and 'very troubling', and said 'half of Jews saying they feel unsafe is an alarming figure'. Right · 2The firm has worked for Hillary Clinton, Michael Bloomberg and the Orthodox Union; JNS received the Jewish-voter findings exclusively. The reported margins of error are 2.87 points (JNS) or 2.97 points (Post) overall, and 4.36 points for the Jewish oversample (Post).

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left0 outlets

No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Centre0 outlets

No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Right2 outlets

Framing
Both outlets present the poll as evidence of the heavy personal and security toll of Oct. 7 on Jewish New Yorkers. JNS leads with emotional impact and the sense the world has moved on; the Post leads with safety fears and harassment amid 'soaring antisemitism'.
Emphasis
JNS: impact, memory of victims, strained relationships, city division. Post: unsafe feelings, harassment, hiding identity, protests.
Leaves out or plays down
Neither carries outside comment or criticism of the poll; the Post leaves out the non-Jewish comparison on impact and strained relationships and the Jewish-sounding-names oversampling method that JNS mentions.
Charged language
“stunning new poll”“eye-popping”“soaring antisemitism”“startling”“Shockingly”“alarming figure”
For example
“according to a stunning new poll” — New York Post
“amid soaring antisemitism in the Big Apple” — New York Post
“It suggests that Israel and the Hamas attack and its aftermath have deeply affected a majority of Jewish New Yorkers” — JNS