Skip to content
Bramble

UK

Teacher, 63, dismissed after saying she is 'pro-life' takes Biddick Academy to tribunal

Anita Meston, 63, says Biddick Academy in Sunderland ended her contract after she told pupils she was 'pro-life'. She is taking discrimination action with Alliance Defending Freedom's backing. The school's side has not been reported.

2 outlets · 0L · 0C · 2R First reported Account updated
Image: Daily Express
Image: GB News

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

Right · 2Anita Meston, 63, a teacher from Durham, is taking legal action for discrimination against her former employer, Biddick Academy, a secondary school in Washington, Sunderland, after her contract was ended. Right · 1According to Meston's account, a pupil asked whether she was "pro-abortion" and she replied that she was "pro-life". She also answered questions about her political views briefly, then returned to the lesson. Right · 1The Express piece, written by her supporters' lawyer, adds detail: she was covering a Year 8 history lesson on the bombing of Dresden and mentioned parallels with the Israel-Palestine conflict. A boy asked whether she was "pro-Israel" and she said she was. Asked to elaborate on her pro-life answer, she cited her Christian faith and women she knew who regretted abortions. When a pupil replied that she knew women who did not regret them, Meston said "fair enough".

Right · 2The next day the headteacher summoned her, said a complaint had been made about the lesson, told her she was not allowed to give personal views in the classroom, and said her contract would be terminated. Right · 2The outlets describe her job differently. GB News calls her a supply teacher working full-time for six months, with her contract renewed the previous week. The Express says she worked full-time for six months, had 28 years' experience and taught Modern Languages and a form group. Right · 1Meston said she was "profoundly shocked" and called the decision "nothing short of censorship". She said she does not believe a teacher should impose beliefs unrelated to the lesson, and that she only gave truthful answers before redirecting pupils.

Right · 2Alliance Defending Freedom, a legal advocacy group, is supporting her case. Its legal counsel, Jeremiah Igunnubole, says the law protects employees from discriminatory treatment and that employers cannot fire staff merely because they disagree with their Christian beliefs. He is also the author of the Express article. Right · 1A preliminary hearing is scheduled for 16 October 2026 at the Employment Tribunal. GB News said it had contacted Biddick Academy for comment, and no response from the school appears in the coverage, so the school's reasons are known only through Meston's account of the headteacher's remarks.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left0 outlets

No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Centre0 outlets

No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Right2 outlets

Framing
Both outlets present the case as a Christian teacher punished for honest answers to pupils, and as part of a wider free-speech problem. The Express piece is an opinion column by an ADF lawyer. GB News reports the legal action largely through statements from Meston and ADF.
Emphasis
Meston's good faith, brief answers and 28 years' experience. The column also stresses a pattern of Christians facing consequences at work and the effect on pupils and other teachers.
Leaves out or plays down
Neither carries a response from the school or the content of the complaint beyond Meston's account. Neither gives the view of the pupil who complained.
Charged language
“Shocking case”“egregious offence”“blatant censorship”“nothing short of censorship”
For example
“Such blatant censorship is particularly concerning in an educational environment” — Daily Express
“What happened to me is nothing short of censorship, and this precedent cannot be allowed to stand.” — GB News

Ask about this story

Loading…