Skip to content
Bramble

UK

Barnet, Bromley and Lambeth seek council tax rises above 5% cap, Barnet up to 32%

Three more London councils have asked the government to let them raise council tax above the 5% cap, with Barnet proposing 32%. They blame the new funding formula; the government says it is fixing an outdated system and has made £11.5bn available to London councils.

2 outlets · 0L · 1C · 1R First reported Account updated
Image: Evening Standard
Image: Daily Express

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

Mixed · 2Barnet, Bromley and Lambeth councils have asked the government for permission to raise council tax by more than the 5% national cap. Mixed · 2Barnet's proposed 32% rise would lift the average Band D bill from £1,622 to £2,060; the Labour-run borough faces a projected £200 million shortfall by 2030, driven by reduced government funding and rising social care costs. Right · 1Barnet has relied on £135 million in emergency government loans to avoid bankruptcy; the Express says this was over the past two years and describes the borough as in talks with the government over the rise.

Mixed · 2Simon Radford, Barnet's cabinet member for financial sustainability, said: "The task is mammoth. We need to find £200m of savings or cost avoidance within three years." Mixed · 2Conservative-run Bromley proposes an unspecified rise above 5% to offset funding cuts of more than £30 million a year; its leader Colin Smith said the cut left "no other viable option" than a "higher-than-desirable council tax increase". Mixed · 2Lambeth, led by the Greens according to the Standard, faces a projected £130 million funding gap by 2029-30; the Express reports the council said no decision had been made on 2027-28 rates and called on ministers to reverse funding cuts.

Mixed · 2The proposals follow the new funding formula, which shifts money towards areas judged to have greater deprivation and social care needs, leaving some historically affluent councils in London and the South East with shortfalls; councils say it ignores factors such as homelessness and cost of living. Mixed · 2Hammersmith and Fulham and Wandsworth have also sought large rises, of 150% and 94% respectively. The Standard says both were given approval earlier this month, while the Express describes Hammersmith and Fulham as weighing the rise and Wandsworth as planning it. Right · 1The Express says the Hammersmith and Fulham rise would add about £29 a week to the average Band D bill, relates only to the council's own share of the bill and remains under consideration; Wandsworth's 94% rise could add £958, and the Conservative-led council blames an £80 million government cut and overspending by the previous Labour administration.

Mixed · 2The Standard says Kensington and Chelsea, Westminster, the City of London, Wandsworth and Hammersmith and Fulham have been cleared to exceed the cap; the Express says the first three are planning double-digit increases and Windsor and Maidenhead is reportedly considering 25%. Mixed · 2The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government said it is "fixing an outdated system so that funding goes where need is greatest" and is making £11.5bn available to London councils, more than a 38% increase since 2024-25. Centre · 1The Standard adds that the government of Prime Minister Andy Burnham faces pressure over the capital's exposure to policies such as a 2028 "mansion tax" on properties above £2 million.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left0 outlets

No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Centre1 outlet

Framing
Explains the rises as a result of the Fair Funding Formula and lists the affected boroughs, with the ministry's response at the end and a political note on the Burnham government.
Emphasis
Barnet's 32% figure, councils' criticism that the formula ignores homelessness and cost of living, and the London-wide pressure on the government.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not mention that the H&F 150% figure covers only the council's own share of the bill, or the Wandsworth and Bromley Band D figures.
Charged language
“controversial framework”
For example
“The controversial framework was officially launched by Angela Rayner in June last year” — Evening Standard
“Thousands more Londoners face hikes in council tax as three London boroughs look to plug holes left by new government spending rules.” — Evening Standard

Right1 outlet

Framing
Leads with the 150% figure as a shock to households, in a tone of alarm, and sets out the funding changes behind the rises across several boroughs.
Emphasis
The largest percentage rises, Wandsworth's £958 increase and its blame on Labour overspending, and the party control of each council.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not mention the Standard's report that five councils have already been cleared to exceed the cap, or the political pressure on the Burnham government; it does note that the 150% figure is only the council's share of the bill.
Charged language
“Council tax bombshell”“dizzying 150% bill hikes”“staggering 150% rise”
For example
“one borough considering a staggering 150% rise” — Daily Express
“The Conservative-led council has blamed an £80 million cut in central Government funding and overspending by the previous Labour administration.” — Daily Express

Ask about this story

Loading…