Skip to content
Bramble

US

US proposes $70,000 fee for schools recommending foreign graduates for work authorization

The Department of Homeland Security has proposed charging schools $70,000 for a student's first Optional Practical Training recommendation and $30,000 for later ones. DHS cites fraud; an international educators' group says it would harm the US economy.

4 outlets · 1L · 3C · 0R First reported Account updated
Image: Newsweek
Image: Raw Story
Image: South China Morning Post
Image: Gulf News

1 / 4

The story, neutrally told

Centre · 1The Trump administration has proposed charging universities $70,000 for each international student they recommend for work authorization in the US after graduation. Centre · 2Under the proposed Optional Practical Training Fees rule, certified schools would pay $70,000 for a student's first Optional Practical Training (OPT) recommendation and $30,000 for each subsequent recommendation, including eligible extensions. Centre · 1The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced the proposal on Wednesday. It said schools would have to pay before recommending a student, and US Citizenship and Immigration Services would not grant employment authorization without payment.

Centre · 1Although schools would be responsible for paying, the proposed rule says they could pass the cost to students or employers, which raises questions about whether institutions would keep recommending students and how participants would finance the charges. Centre · 2Currently, eligible F-1 students can receive up to 12 months of temporary employment authorization for work related to their field of study, and graduates in qualifying STEM fields may be eligible for a further 24-month extension. Centre · 2DHS said the fees are meant to combat fraud, improve oversight, encourage universities to scrutinize applications more closely and protect American workers, citing suspected "pay-to-stay" schemes and false employment. A DHS spokesperson said OPT "was never meant to be a back door into the American workforce, a subsidy for cheap labour, or a prize for those who game the system."

Centre · 1NAFSA: Association of International Educators criticised the plan. Its executive director and chief executive, Fanta Aw, said international students "don't take opportunities from Americans, they create them" and that the change would hurt American innovation and economic growth. NAFSA said it would submit detailed comments. Centre · 1Nearly 62,000 Chinese students took part in OPT in 2024-2025, according to the Institute of International Education's Open Doors report, so the South China Morning Post said the fee could sharply raise costs for thousands of Chinese graduates. Centre · 2The fees are not yet in effect. DHS will accept public comments from October 8 through November 9 and could revise the rule. The rule would take effect 60 days after a final rule is published, and existing OPT approvals and school recommendations issued before then would not trigger the fee.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left1 outlet

No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Centre3 outlets

Framing
Both outlets report the proposal as a DHS rule proposal still open to comment. Newsweek leads on the scale of the change for a programme used by hundreds of thousands of students. The South China Morning Post leads on the cost to Chinese graduates.
Emphasis
Fee amounts, the DHS fraud rationale, and the proposal's non-final status. The South China Morning Post adds NAFSA's criticism, the comment period and the Chinese student numbers.
Leaves out or plays down
Newsweek's piece, still developing, has no reaction from critics or details of the comment period. The South China Morning Post does not detail the alleged abuses beyond DHS's description.
Charged language
“pay-to-stay”“back door into the American workforce”“sweeping change”
For example
“a sweeping change that could sharply restrict access to a program used by hundreds of thousands of foreign students” — Newsweek
“a measure that could sharply raise the cost for thousands of Chinese graduates seeking employment experience in the country” — South China Morning Post

Right0 outlets

No right outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.