Skip to content
Bramble

US

Opinion writers on both sides reject efforts to rehabilitate Richard Nixon's legacy

Two opinion pieces, one from the left and one from the right, respond to efforts by Republicans and Trump allies to recast Richard Nixon's reputation. Both defend the verdict on Watergate, but they differ on who is behind the effort and why.

2 outlets · 1L · 0C · 1R First reported Account updated
Image: Raw Story
Image: Washington Examiner

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

Mixed · 2Two opinion columns published on 11 October 2026 take aim at efforts to improve Richard Nixon's historical reputation, more than 50 years after Watergate. Left · 1In Raw Story, Sabrina Haake, a political analyst and federal trial attorney, writes that Donald Trump's Department of Justice "has begun rehabilitating the reputation of former President Richard Nixon". The claim appears in her opinion piece, and the excerpt provided does not cite a specific DOJ action. Left · 1Haake says the new line among Trump defenders is that Nixon was a victim of "lawfare", like Trump. She cites Republican Rep. Riley Moore of West Virginia, who she says called Nixon "framed" and wants an aircraft carrier named after him.

Left · 1She also quotes Vice President JD Vance, who she says told an audience at the Richard Nixon library in June that "the deep state took down Richard Nixon" and that Watergate would be "a 12-hour news story" if it happened now. Haake adds that Trump has asked several times why Nixon resigned. Left · 1Haake argues the revisionism is meant to soften views of Trump and to justify rolling back post-Watergate DOJ limits on presidential authority. She links this to Trump's firing of inspectors general and his assertion of the right to fire over two million career civil servants, and she also lists allegations of Trump family enrichment. These are her characterisations and are not established in the piece itself. Right · 1In the Washington Examiner, author Michael Levin says Nixon's reputation "has lain rightfully in tatters" because of his cover-up of the Watergate investigation. He says "Nixon's apologists" are working to clean up the former president's image, and he does not name the Justice Department among them.

Right · 1Levin gives his own account of Watergate. He says Nixon had no advance knowledge of the break-in but chose "the hangout route" of denial, and that more than two dozen White House operatives, and even the attorney general, went to prison over the cover-up. Nixon resigned on 8 August 1974. Right · 1Levin says Nixon deserves credit for his opening to China, détente with the Soviet Union, his support for Israel in the 1973 Yom Kippur war, his environmentalism and his economic decisions. He argues, though, that this should not erase the damage to public trust in the presidency. He attributes the revival of Nixon's image partly to a younger generation of conservatives who lack first-hand memories of Watergate. Mixed · 2Both pieces are opinion. Neither reports a specific Justice Department filing or announcement, and no news report in the coverage confirms the DOJ's role.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left1 outlet

Framing
Treats Nixon's rehabilitation as a political tool of the Trump administration, with the DOJ named as an actor. Reads it as a "confession" of Trump's own wrongdoing.
Emphasis
Trump's alleged corruption and enrichment, the rollback of post-Watergate DOJ constraints, and Republicans' failure to hold Trump to account as they did Nixon.
Leaves out or plays down
Gives no specific DOJ action behind the rehabilitation claim. Does not acknowledge the achievements of Nixon's presidency.
Charged language
“Terrified Trump's desperate spin”“weaponizing the DOJ”“Trump’s crimes against the United States”“Trump’s rampant criminality”
For example
“this kind of revisionism sounds like a confession that Trump is more corrupt than Nixon ever was.” — Raw Story

Centre0 outlets

No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Right1 outlet

Framing
A conservative columnist defends the Watergate verdict against Nixon's apologists. He frames the revisionism as dishonest and harmful to public trust, and does not tie it to Trump or the DOJ.
Emphasis
A first-hand, narrative account of Watergate, Nixon's cover-up as the cause of his downfall, and a balanced acknowledgement of his foreign-policy record.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not mention the Justice Department or any administration role in the effort. Mentions Trump only in passing, in connection with pardons.
Charged language
“filthy legacy”“lie their heads off”“Nixon’s apologists”
For example
“Nixon got exactly what he deserved.” — Washington Examiner