Skip to content
Bramble

Politics

Trump says US may have "gone too far" killing Iran's leaders, as it is unclear who to negotiate with

At an Ohio campaign rally, President Trump said the US may have gone too far in targeting Iran's leadership because Washington no longer knows who to deal with. Trump also repeated that Iran will never get a nuclear weapon and that its navy is destroyed.

2 outlets · 0L · 1C · 1R First reported Account updated
Image: The Jerusalem Post

The story, neutrally told

Mixed · 2US President Donald Trump said on Monday 13 October that Washington may have gone "too far" in targeting Iran's leadership, because the killing of senior Iranian officials had made it harder to identify who the US could negotiate with. Mixed · 2Trump spoke at a campaign rally in Youngstown, Ohio, where he said: "We might have gone too far with the leaders because we don't know who the hell we're dealing with anymore." Centre · 1According to the Hindustan Times, Trump added that the US "could have stopped at level one" and that "level two and level two and a half was probably going too far".

Right · 1Trump also claimed that "nobody wants to be the president of Iran", saying potential candidates were unwilling to take the position. Mixed · 2Despite the admission, Trump kept a hard line, calling Iran "the number one state sponsor of terror" and saying it would not be allowed to obtain nuclear weapons. Mixed · 2Trump repeated that US operations had destroyed Iran's air force and navy, saying Iran had lost all 159 of its naval vessels, "resting beautifully in the bottom of the sea". The Hindustan Times noted that the White House has not released updated military assessments supporting that specific figure.

Mixed · 2Both outlets say the comments echoed Vice President JD Vance, who told Reuters the US remained uncertain how decisions were made within Iran's leadership and that any deal would require Tehran to make meaningful cuts to its nuclear enrichment capacity. Centre · 1The Hindustan Times places the remarks in the context of months of fighting, with Washington pursuing both military pressure and diplomacy, and says negotiations remain uncertain.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left0 outlets

No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Centre1 outlet

Framing
Hindustan Times leads on the admission of a possible overreach and the resulting diplomatic uncertainty, adding context on the war, Hormuz and midterm fuel-price concerns through links, and noting the lack of evidence for the naval figure.
Emphasis
Trump's "level one" and "level two and a half" remarks, uncertainty over who holds decision-making authority in Tehran, and the unsupported 159-vessel figure.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not report Trump's claim that nobody wants to be president of Iran.
Charged language
“gone too far”
For example
“The White House has not released updated military assessments supporting that specific figure.” — Hindustan Times
“Trump acknowledged that the extensive targeting of Iran’s leadership had created uncertainty over who now holds decision-making authority in Tehran.” — Hindustan Times

Right1 outlet

Framing
The Jerusalem Post reports the remarks as a short rally account, calling Iran's rulers "regime leaders" in the headline and giving space to Trump's claims about Iran's destroyed navy.
Emphasis
Trump's "nobody wants to be the president of Iran" claim, the navy's destruction, and Iran being barred from nuclear weapons.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not note that the 159-vessel figure lacks supporting official assessments, and omits the "level one" remarks.
Charged language
“regime leaders”“resting beautifully in the bottom of the sea”
For example
“Trump reiterates claims Iranian navy 'at the bottom of the sea'” — The Jerusalem Post
““Nobody wants to be the president of Iran,” he added, claiming that potential candidates were unwilling to assume the position.” — The Jerusalem Post

Ask about this story

Loading…