Skip to content
Bramble

US

Two Illinois protesters sue Benny Johnson for defamation over 'terrorist' claims

Kyle Frankovich and Maureen Foody, detained outside the Broadview ICE facility in 2025, sued podcaster Benny Johnson in federal court, saying he falsely portrayed them as violent extremists who attacked agents. Johnson had not responded to a request for comment.

4 outlets · 3L · 0C · 1R First reported Account updated

Updated (version 2). New coverage since the last version from The Independent, Washington Examiner.

Image: Raw Story
Image: Washington Examiner
Image: The Independent

1 / 3

The story, neutrally told

Left · 1Two Illinois residents who were detained outside a Chicago-area immigration detention center last year have sued right-wing podcaster Benny Johnson for defamation. Left · 1The lawsuit says Johnson falsely claimed the protesters were assaulting ICE officers during demonstrations at an ICE facility in Illinois last year. Left · 1The plaintiffs are Kyle Frankovich, a data scientist at Harvard University, and Maureen Foody, a contract court reporter; they filed the suit on Friday 2 October in federal court in the Northern District of Illinois, as reported by MS NOW.

Left · 1They say they were protesting peacefully outside the Broadview ICE facility when they were detained, and that Johnson knowingly portrayed them as criminals. Left · 1On 3 October 2025, Johnson joined then-Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and former Border Patrol commander Gregory Bovino at Broadview, a site that had become a flashpoint with viral videos of agents shoving demonstrators and firing tear gas and pepper balls. Left · 1According to the complaint, the plaintiffs were standing in a designated "free speech" zone when agents, without provocation, shoved, struck and detained several protesters.

Left · 1In one video Johnson showed about 10 detained protesters, including the plaintiffs, with their hands zip-tied and called them "left-wing terrorists arrested for attacking police officers and ICE officers"; the complaint says "All of this was false, which Mr. Johnson knew." Left · 1One post claiming "every activist here attacked ICE agents" drew 1.7 million views, and the suit says hundreds of commenters called for the protesters to be prosecuted or deported, and some for them to be tortured or killed. Left · 1Neither plaintiff was charged with a crime; the complaint says they were held about eight hours and released a half-mile from the facility.

Left · 1Frankovich told MS NOW he was shaken by the online reaction and that Johnson's followers labeled him an antifa leader and were "trying to find me and stop me." Left · 1Plaintiffs' attorney Karianne Jones said the suit aims to hold accountable people who "serve as a mouthpiece for the government", and the complaint calls Johnson's content "political combat dressed up as news". Left · 1Raw Story says the case appears to be the first defamation suit tied to the Trump administration's immigration crackdown to target one of the pro-Trump influencers given special access to cover federal operations.

Left · 1Johnson did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Right · 1The Washington Examiner reports the suit seeks compensatory and punitive damages and says Johnson also repeated the accusations on consecutive days across platforms, with one video later broadcast on Fox News. Mixed · 2The Independent and the Washington Examiner say the Department of Homeland Security later posted an image of Frankovich in zip ties; the Independent adds that it carried the caption "FAFO" and that DHS used the footage in recruitment material.

Left · 1The Independent quotes the complaint as saying Johnson said in a video that "These individuals assaulted ICE officers as they were trying to clear out the area," and that he "knows that his portrayals were false. But he did not care." Left · 1The Independent also said it had requested comment from Johnson's representatives.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left3 outlets

Framing
Raw Story, NPR and The Independent present the suit as protesters holding a pro-Trump influencer to account; Raw Story leads with 'MAGA influencer' and 'smears', The Independent with 'Trump-booster' and quotes the complaint at length, NPR with 'pro-Trump influencer'.
Emphasis
The plaintiffs' account, the complaint's wording, Johnson's taunts, DHS's 'FAFO' post, and ties between influencers and the administration.
Leaves out or plays down
No response from Johnson, ICE or DHS; the agents' reason for detaining the protesters beyond the complaint's version.
Charged language
“MAGA influencer”“smears”“Trump-booster”
For example
“Trump-booster Benny Johnson hit with defamation suit for calling ICE protesters terrorists” — The Independent
“Pro-Trump Influencer Benny Johnson is being sued for defamation by ICE protesters” — NPR

Centre0 outlets

No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Right1 outlet

Framing
The Washington Examiner reports the suit in a straight, allegation-attributed way, headlined around the 'ICE ride-along videos' and describing Johnson as a 'conservative media personality'.
Emphasis
What the complaint alleges, the damages sought, and background on Operation Midway Blitz and Johnson's access to officials.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not mention the 'political combat dressed up as news' line, the threats from commenters, or DHS's 'FAFO' caption; no response from Johnson.
For example
“Two Illinois protesters are suing conservative media personality Benny Johnson and his company” — Washington Examiner
“The suit alleged Johnson falsely claimed he saw the plaintiffs engage in violence” — Washington Examiner