Skip to content
Bramble

Climate

UN chief Guterres: subsidising fossil fuels is 'subsidising suicide'

Speaking in Yerevan ahead of the UN biodiversity summit, UN Secretary-General António Guterres urged governments to end fossil fuel subsidies. The UN says about $30 still goes to activities that harm nature for every dollar spent protecting it.

2 outlets · 1L · 0C · 1R First reported Account updated
Image: The Hindu
Image: The Straits Times

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

Mixed · 2UN Secretary-General António Guterres on 16 October 2026 urged governments to stop subsidising the production of fossil fuels, which he said are “boiling our planet and are the scourge of biodiversity”. Mixed · 2Addressing leaders in Yerevan, Armenia, ahead of next week's UN biodiversity summit, he said governments were still “spending money on the wrong things” and singled out incentives for fossil fuels. Mixed · 2“Subsidising fossil fuels is subsidising suicide,” Guterres said, adding: “I urge governments everywhere to end these handouts once and for all, and to use the savings for people and planet instead.”

Mixed · 2Nations have made little headway since pledging in 2022 to reduce public spending on activities that harm nature, such as mining, fossil fuel extraction and intensive farming. Mixed · 2The UN says that for every dollar invested in protecting or restoring nature, about $30 still goes into activities that degrade it, including an estimated $2.6 trillion a year in public subsidies that negatively affect nature and the climate. Mixed · 2Nearly 200 nations are due to take part in the UN biodiversity negotiations in Yerevan starting on Monday 19 October, where a lack of finance for nature will be a core focus.

Mixed · 2Guterres also launched a report showing the world is off track to meet the 2030 biodiversity targets set out in a landmark pact for nature; The Hindu dates the launch to Thursday 15 October, while The Straits Times gives 16 October.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left1 outlet

Framing
The Hindu runs the AFP report with the UN's $30-to-$1 spending imbalance as its lede, surrounded by links to its own climate coverage (COP31, fossil fuel phase-out, European heatwave).
Emphasis
The scale of environmental harm in public spending and the link to wider climate policy.
Leaves out or plays down
No notable omissions relative to the other copy; it lacks the dollar conversion into Singapore currency.
Charged language
“subsidising suicide”“scourge of biodiversity”
For example
“The United Nations says that for every dollar invested in protecting or restoring nature, about $30 still goes into activities that degrade it.” — The Hindu
“Is the world closer to phasing out fossil fuel? | Explained” — The Hindu

Centre0 outlets

No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Right1 outlet

Framing
The Straits Times runs the same AFP report, leading with Guterres's quote that governments are 'spending money on the wrong things'.
Emphasis
Guterres's call to end fossil fuel handouts; adds a Singapore-dollar conversion for readers.
Leaves out or plays down
Carries no related climate-policy context; the text is shorter than the other copy.
Charged language
“subsidising suicide”“boiling our planet”
For example
“Guterres said governments were still “spending money on the wrong things” and singled out incentives for fossil fuels.” — The Straits Times
“about US$30 (S$38) still goes into activities that degrade it” — The Straits Times

Ask about this story

Loading…