Skip to content
Bramble

UK

Unnamed public figure asks High Court to block Guardian and ITN sexual-allegation reports

A well-known man, referred to in court as PPT, is seeking a permanent injunction to stop the Guardian and ITN publishing allegations of inappropriate sexual activities with young women and girls, citing a high risk of suicide. A two-day High Court trial began on 27 October.

3 outlets · 2L · 1C · 0R First reported Account updated
Image: BBC News
Image: The Guardian
Image: Daily Mirror

1 / 3

The story, neutrally told

Mixed · 2A two-day trial opened at the High Court in London on 27 October in which a well-known man, referred to in court as PPT, is seeking a permanent injunction to stop the Guardian and ITN publishing allegations about him. Centre · 1The allegations are that he abused his status over many years to engage, or attempt to engage, in "inappropriate sexual activities with a large number of girls and young women"; he denies them. Mixed · 2His legal team argues that publication would "highly likely lead him to commit suicide", saying this stems not from guilt but from shame arising from deep-rooted childhood trauma and fear of "trial by media".

Left · 1His lead barrister, Sara Mansoori KC, told the court he first attempted suicide in May, when the Guardian and ITN contacted him for a response, and was admitted to hospital as a voluntary patient that afternoon; a second attempt followed in July, when he absconded from a secure hospital. Left · 1His team says he is detained in a psychiatric hospital for his own safety and has no intention of returning to public life, and relies on articles 2 (right to life), 3 (inhuman or degrading treatment) and 8 (private and family life) of the European Convention on Human Rights. Centre · 1The Guardian and ITN say there is no proper basis "to restrain the publication of public interest journalism" and that the suicide risk can be mitigated.

Left · 1In written submissions they said the allegations rest on more than 30 sources with first-hand accounts in a "wide-ranging and rigorous investigation", that the European Court of Human Rights has never required a state to prevent publication of journalism to guard against an individual's suicide risk, and that any state duty should be met through NHS treatment and Mental Health Act powers. Mixed · 2A medical report prepared for the court said inpatient treatment, perhaps for months, could give "significant, but not complete mitigation of the risk". An independent expert said community arrangements would not suffice and that publication while he remains an inpatient would be significantly safer, but did not conclude suicide is inevitable or that treatment can eliminate all risk. Mixed · 2Mr Justice Nicklin called it "a difficult and important case" of "significant public interest" to be decided on the evidence and legal submissions. He warned that online speculation has named several different individuals and asked that there be no further attempts to identify PPT or anyone else whose identity is protected. The news outlets are due to set out their case on Wednesday.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left2 outlets

Framing
A detailed court report by the Guardian, which is itself a defendant, leading on the claimant's bid to stop publication and the suicide-risk claim.
Emphasis
The claimant's two reported suicide attempts, the legal grounds under the ECHR, the outlets' 30-plus first-hand sources and the judge's warning about speculation.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not include the BBC's report of the claimant's team saying treatment might take months or the judge's remark about 'significant public interest'.
Charged language
“highly exceptional”“well-known individual”
For example
“the allegations involved more than 30 sources with first-hand accounts, as part of a “wide-ranging and rigorous investigation”” — The Guardian
““It would be a travesty if the court didn’t step in to act in these circumstances,” Mansoori said.” — The Guardian

Centre1 outlet

Framing
A concise report of the opening of the trial, leading on the allegation and the claimant's suicide-risk argument, with the media organisations' response and the judge's remarks.
Emphasis
The claimant's denial, the suicide-risk argument, the medical report on inpatient treatment, and the judge's comment on public interest.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not give the claimant's hospital history, the ECHR articles relied on, the media outlets' 30-source claim or the judge's warning about online speculation.
Charged language
“trial by media”
For example
“The legal team for ITN and The Guardian told the court that the celebrity's "suicide risk" could be mitigated” — BBC News

Right0 outlets

No right outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Ask about this story

Loading…