Skip to content
Bramble

Health

Study: about a quarter of male US Army soldiers could screen as low in testosterone

A JAMA study of 479 male soldiers estimates 26% would have a low testosterone reading, or about 100,691 men, as the Pentagon rolls out screening. Outside experts say a single low reading does not mean a deficiency.

2 outlets · 1L · 1C · 0R First reported Account updated
Image: New Scientist
Image: Ars Technica

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

Mixed · 2A study published in JAMA on 15 October 2026 estimates that about 26 per cent of male active-duty US Army soldiers would get a low testosterone result, equal to roughly 100,691 men. Mixed · 2The researchers, from the Pennington Biomedical Research Center in Louisiana and the US Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, used data from a military health survey at five installations. Morning fasting blood samples were collected between August 2024 and January 2026. Mixed · 2Total testosterone was measured in 479 men, after excluding three who were receiving testosterone treatment. The weighted mean was 405 ng/dL, and the weighted mean age was about 30. Female personnel were not analysed because their levels were often below the limits of detection.

Mixed · 2The 26 per cent figure uses a cutoff of below 300 ng/dL, which the American Urological Association classes as low and which the Pentagon guidance also uses. With the lower Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reference cutoff of 264 ng/dL, the estimate falls to about 15 per cent. Mixed · 2Low readings were more common with age: 33 per cent of men aged 30 and older were low, against 19.5 per cent of those under 30. Ars Technica adds that the odds also rose with body mass index. Mixed · 2Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced the programme in July. All service members aged 30 and older must have annual screening and be offered voluntary testosterone replacement therapy if low. Younger personnel can opt in. Hegseth described the aim as "restoring and optimising your natural capabilities" and said there are no ramifications for declining therapy. The Pentagon issued clinical guidance in September.

Centre · 1Outside experts question the approach. Darren Katz of the University of Melbourne, who was not involved, says a single test is unreliable because levels vary with time of day, food, sleep, obesity, illness and stress. The American Urological Association advises diagnosis only when symptoms are also present. Katz says there is insufficient evidence that treatment improves military readiness, and he favours targeted, symptom-based testing. Left · 1Ars Technica reports that the Endocrine Society and the American Urological Association have recommended against blanket screening. It says clinically significant male hypogonadism affects at most 1 per cent of men, and warns of cascades of follow-up testing, overtreatment and harms including infertility. The study authors note that published estimates of clinical hypogonadism are far lower than the share with a low reading. Left · 1Actual testing numbers may be lower than the study implies, because the screening starts with questions about symptoms and risk factors. Ars Technica says those symptoms, such as "low motivation" and "disturbed sleep", are vague, and risk factors such as obesity and type 2 diabetes are common. Men with risk factors can be tested without symptoms, so many more soldiers will likely be tested than before. It is unclear how many under-30s will opt in.

Centre · 1Side effects of testosterone therapy named by New Scientist include acne, testicle shrinkage, reduced sperm production and fertility, and in older men a higher risk of fractures and pulmonary embolism. Timothy Piatkowski of the University of Queensland warns that testosterone is increasingly used as a proxy for masculinity, so high levels could be conflated with being a good soldier.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left1 outlet

Framing
Treats the study as evidence against a flawed policy, with a critical headline about Hegseth's screening.
Emphasis
Medical bodies' opposition, rarity of true hypogonadism, risk of cascading unnecessary evaluations and overtreatment, and the CDC 15% alternative.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not include Hegseth's stated rationale or any quoted defence of the programme.
Charged language
“dubious”“clinically dubious”“ensnared”
For example
“Hegseth’s dubious low-T screening may flag up to 25 percent of the Army” — Ars Technica
“offers a glimpse of how many Army members could become ensnared in the clinically dubious screenings” — Ars Technica

Centre1 outlet

Framing
Presents the study result as a headline finding, then outside expert comment on its implications for the policy.
Emphasis
Katz's caveats on single tests, side effects of therapy and Piatkowski's concern about masculinity; includes Hegseth's quoted rationale.
Leaves out or plays down
Omits the CDC cutoff alternative, the 1% hypogonadism figure and details of the Pentagon's symptom-first screening process.
For example
“A quarter of male soldiers in the US could have low testosterone” — New Scientist
““about restoring and optimising your natural capabilities, protecting your longevity, ensuring you have the biological foundation required to sustain the fight”” — New Scientist

Right0 outlets

No right outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Ask about this story

Loading…