Skip to content
Bramble

US

Miami judge dismisses noncitizen voting case, finds federal law unconstitutional

US District Judge David Leibowitz dismissed a federal prosecution of Florida resident Chelsea Cox, ruling that the 1996 federal law against noncitizen voting is unconstitutional because only states can set voter qualifications. The ruling binds only this case.

2 outlets · 1L · 0C · 1R First reported Account updated
Image: The Jerusalem Post
Image: Al Jazeera

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

On Thursday 1 October 2026, US District Judge David Leibowitz in Miami dismissed a federal case against Chelsea Cox, a Florida resident originally from Jamaica, who was charged in October 2025 with illegally voting in the 2020 election. He found the law criminalizing noncitizen voting unconstitutional, writing that under the US Constitution only states, not Congress, can set voter qualifications; the ruling appears to be the first time a federal court has found the 1996 law unconstitutional. Because every state requires citizenship to vote, Leibowitz said it was up to Florida, not the Justice Department, to prosecute Cox, writing that Florida "can and does" punish the conduct.

The ruling applies only to Cox's case and does not bind other judges, though about 45 similar cases are pending and at least four other defendants have raised the same challenge; Reuters noted judges in those cases may find his reasoning persuasive. In a court filing the Justice Department had argued that Congress, not the states, was best equipped to handle immigration and foreign affairs, writing that "Foreign interference in elections is clearly within the purview of Congress." Neither the White House nor the Justice Department immediately responded to Reuters' requests for comment. According to court filings, Cox entered the US as a tourist in 1999, overstayed her visa, and used a fraudulent US Virgin Islands birth certificate to get a Florida driver's license and register to vote in 2012; she voted in federal elections from 2012 to 2020, but only 2020 fell within the statute of limitations.

The decision is a setback for the Trump administration, which has made noncitizen voting a centrepiece of its election-fraud push ahead of the November midterms; the Justice Department has charged at least 60 people since January 2025. Both outlets, citing a Reuters investigation, say 129 people have been charged with "voting by an alien"; none was accused of conspiring to sway an election, backing a candidate or being paid, and most were lawful permanent residents who registered by mistake or on bad advice from an election worker or clerk. Trump has said stricter enforcement of documented citizenship is needed for election integrity and falsely claims fraud cost him the 2020 election; critics say the crackdown exaggerates a rare problem.

Cox's lawyer, Bruce Udolf, welcomed the ruling and said he hoped the government would not seek to deport her, citing her declining health.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on.

Left1 outlet

Framing
Al Jazeera leads with the ruling as a constitutional decision on state jurisdiction and a setback for Trump's fraud crackdown, in a short account.
Emphasis
Limited scope of the ruling, Cox's background, and Reuters data showing charged people mostly made mistakes.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not include the Justice Department's argument that Congress handles foreign interference, or the Trump claims about 278,000 registrations and the New Jersey case.
For example
“Trump has falsely claimed that noncitizen voting, which is already illegal and rare, cost him the 2020 election” — Al Jazeera

Centre0 outlets

No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Right1 outlet

Framing
The Jerusalem Post carries a Reuters report framing the ruling as a blow to the Trump administration's election-fraud campaign, with fuller context.
Emphasis
Justice Department's counter-argument, possible persuasive effect on other cases, Reuters investigation, deportations, and the New Jersey and 278,000 claims.
Leaves out or plays down
Little distinct from the agency copy; no Justice Department or White House response was available.
Charged language
“falsely claims”
For example
“delivering a blow to the Trump administration's campaign against alleged election fraud” — The Jerusalem Post