Skip to content
Bramble

Business

House China committee says Webull's China ties are a national security risk; company disputes report

The House Select Committee on China released a report saying trading platform Webull has structural ties to China that endanger US investors and data. Webull says the report has significant inaccuracies, and its shares fell sharply.

2 outlets · 0L · 1C · 1R First reported Account updated
Image: Breitbart

The story, neutrally told

Mixed · 2The House Select Committee on China published a report on Wednesday 7 October 2026 concluding that the digital investment platform Webull has "structural ties" to the Chinese government that pose national security risks to the US financial system. Mixed · 2The report was shared exclusively with CNBC, which both outlets cite as their source. Mixed · 2The committee said there is a gap between Webull's image as an American company and how it operates, pointing to its ownership architecture, technical workforce, technology infrastructure, cross-border data routing, corporate financing and compliance systems.

Mixed · 2It said Webull's software development, data pipelines and core engineering depend on infrastructure subject to Chinese law, under which authorities can compel companies to cooperate, including by handing over data. Mixed · 2The committee said the risk grew after October 2025, when Webull began holding customer cash directly according to a regulatory filing, which it said creates "structural exposure" involving billions of dollars of American capital. Mixed · 2The report also says Webull told the committee it had no offices or employees in China, yet its mainland subsidiary, Hunan Weibu, employs 863 people, which Breitbart reports as 62 percent of its global workforce.

Right · 1Committee chair Rep. John Moolenaar (R-MI) said Webull's "China-based operations put American investors and their data at risk" and urged investors to heed the information when choosing who to do business with. Centre · 1The committee's wider worry is that China-linked financial infrastructure placed in the US financial sector could later be used to disrupt the economy if US-China tensions sharply escalate. Mixed · 2Webull rejected the report, with a spokesperson citing "significant inaccuracies and unsupported conclusions" and saying the committee never sought clarification before publishing.

Mixed · 2The company says its US business runs from headquarters in St. Petersburg, Florida, and an office in New York City, that US customer data is stored in the US, and that access to sensitive data is controlled by its US operations. It says it is ready to answer regulators' questions, as it does with the SEC and FINRA. Right · 1According to Breitbart, Webull's Nasdaq-listed stock fell 18 percent in morning trading and closed down 19 percent, and the law firm Schall, Brown & Schwartz announced an investor investigation. Breitbart also says the committee's inquiry began with an information request in 2024 and that Webull has 28 million global users.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left0 outlets

No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Centre1 outlet

Framing
Explainer-style piece asking why lawmakers see a risk, with the committee's concerns laid out in sections and Webull's rebuttal given a prominent place; it calls the committee bipartisan.
Emphasis
Chinese law and data access, the October 2025 customer-cash change, and Webull's denial and its US data and headquarters claims.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not quote Moolenaar, report the share-price drop, or say the inquiry began in 2024.
Charged language
“deep structural links”“major national security warning”
For example
“A bipartisan House Select Committee on China has accused the digital investment platform” — Hindustan Times
“Webull strongly disputes that conclusion and says the congressional report contains inaccurate and unsupported claims.” — Hindustan Times

Right1 outlet

Framing
Leads with the committee's conclusion that Webull's CCP connections put Americans at risk, quoting chair Moolenaar and adding market and investor-lawsuit consequences.
Emphasis
Moolenaar's quotes about an "opaque China-linked ownership structure", the 62 percent workforce figure, the share drop and the law-firm investigation.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not describe the committee as bipartisan; Webull's response is included but placed after the committee's allegations.
Charged language
“foremost adversary”“opaque China-linked ownership structure”“CCP”
For example
“Webull exposes its data to our foremost adversary.” — Breitbart
“Investment Platform Webull's Connections to CCP Put Americans at Risk” — Breitbart