US Navy and Marine boards reportedly vote to keep transgender troops despite discharge policy
A New York Times survey, relayed by two right-leaning outlets, found most Navy and Marine Corps review boards voted to retain transgender service members despite the Pentagon's push to remove them. The Army and Air Force are largely discharging them.
1 / 1
The story, neutrally told
Right · 2Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth announced to an auditorium of Marines in September that he was ridding the military of all transgender troops. The Straits TimesRC “US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth used a slur to proudly announce to an auditorium of Marines in September that he was ridding the military of all transgender troops.” Read at The Straits Times ↗ Hot AirR “Just one month after US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced the exile of all transgender troops from the military” Read at Hot Air ↗ Right · 1The Pentagon set up review boards at bases around the globe, staffed by ordinary uniformed service members with narrow orders that, according to the Straits Times, all but ensured transgender troops appearing before them would be voted out. The Straits TimesRC “The Pentagon had set up review boards at bases around the globe, staffed by everyday uniformed service members with narrow orders that all but ensured that the trans troops appearing before them would be voted out.” Read at The Straits Times ↗ Right · 1Of 12 Navy and Marine Corps boards surveyed by the New York Times, nine voted to retain their transgender service members against orders, according to Hot Air's account of that reporting. Hot AirR “Of the 12 Navy and Marine Corps boards recently surveyed by the New York Times, nine have voted to retain their trans service members against orders.” Read at Hot Air ↗
Right · 1The same pattern has not been observed in the Army or Air Force, which are largely discharging transgender personnel. Hot AirR “While the same pattern has not been observed in the Army or Air Force, who are largely discharging trans personnel” Read at Hot Air ↗ Right · 1Rachel VanLandingham, a former Air Force lawyer, told the New York Times the boards were being told to "rubber-stamp a non-choice" and that members were choosing to "nullify a process they see as unjust." Hot AirR ““These boards are being told to do something that they know is wrong — to rubber-stamp a non-choice given to them by the administration,” Rachel VanLandingham, a former Air Force lawyer, told the New York Times.” Read at Hot Air ↗ Right · 1The Straits Times reported that the Trump administration claims transgender troops, about 0.1% of the military, are a costly burden on military effectiveness, a position it says military findings contradict. The Straits TimesRC “The Trump administration claims that trans troops are a costly burden on military effectiveness – a position that military findings contradict.”“The Trump administration claims that trans troops, comprising 0.1% of the military, are a costly burden on military effectiveness.” Read at The Straits Times ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left0 outlets
No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Centre0 outlets
No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Right2 outlets
- Framing
- Both outlets relay New York Times reporting that review boards are resisting the discharge policy; Hot Air frames it as the military 'fighting back' while the Straits Times lead stresses that military findings contradict the administration.
- Emphasis
- Board resistance, the Navy/Marine versus Army/Air Force split, and a former Air Force lawyer's comment that boards are nullifying an unjust process.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Neither gives the Pentagon's or administration's response to the boards' votes, or details of the board procedure and what happens after a retention vote.
- Charged language
- “defying orders”“exile”“fighting back”“slur”
- For example
-
“Just one month after US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced the exile of all transgender troops from the military, the military is fighting back.” — Hot Air
“US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth used a slur to proudly announce” — The Straits Times
What every side reports
- Hegseth announced in September that transgender troops would be removed from the military.
- Review boards are central to the discharge process and some are declining to discharge.
Where accounts differ
-
Whether transgender troops are a burden on military effectiveness
- Right
- The Straits Times says the administration claims they are a costly burden, which military findings contradict.
Trump administration organisation
Per the Straits Times, the administration claims transgender troops, about 0.1% of the military, are a costly burden on military effectiveness; Hegseth announced he was removing all of them.
“The Trump administration claims that trans troops, comprising 0.1% of the military, are a costly burden on military effectiveness.” — The Straits Times
Left0 articles
No coverage yet.
Centre0 articles
No coverage yet.
Right2 articles
-
US military boards are defying orders and letting trans troops serve
Critical Presents the review boards as defying a policy and says military findings contradict the administration's claim that transgender troops are a burden.
-
Hot AirR ·
US Navy & Marine Corps Boards Defying Orders To Keep Trans Personnel
Sympathetic Portrays the Navy and Marine boards' votes as the military resisting an anti-trans agenda, backed by a quoted former Air Force lawyer.
- 27 Oct 00:20 First The Straits TimesRC US military boards are defying orders and letting trans troops serve
- 28 Oct 13:00 +36h 40m Hot AirR US Navy & Marine Corps Boards Defying Orders To Keep Trans Personnel
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.
Ask about this story
Loading…