US reportedly proposed unfreezing some Russian assets under US-run vehicle; Europeans refused
The Financial Times reported that US negotiators asked European countries to release part of the frozen Russian sovereign assets into a Washington-overseen vehicle to revive peace talks. European delegates rejected the idea, according to the report.
Updated (version 2). New coverage since the last version from The Straits Times.
1 / 3
The story, neutrally told
Mixed · 2The Financial Times reported on Wednesday, citing four people briefed on the matter, that the US had proposed European countries unfreeze some Russian sovereign assets and transfer them to a financial vehicle overseen by Washington, to revive peace negotiations over Ukraine. Anadolu AgencyN “transfer them to a financial vehicle overseen by Washington in an effort to revive peace negotiations, the Financial Times reported Wednesday” Read at Anadolu Agency ↗ MeduzaLC “four sources told the Financial Times” Read at Meduza ↗ Mixed · 2The proposal was reportedly made by US envoy Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, son-in-law of President Donald Trump, at talks in Miami (Meduza dates them to 9 October) with representatives of Ukraine, France, Germany, the UK, the EU and NATO. Anadolu AgencyN “presented several possible mechanisms for releasing the assets” Read at Anadolu Agency ↗ MeduzaLC “during talks in Miami on October 9 with representatives of Ukraine, France, Germany, the United Kingdom, the European Union, and NATO” Read at Meduza ↗ Mixed · 2The assets' fate was discussed as part of a comprehensive peace agreement, and the US set out several options, including a new special-purpose vehicle under US oversight. Anadolu AgencyN “including transferring them to a new special-purpose financial vehicle under US oversight” Read at Anadolu Agency ↗ MeduzaLC “fate of the frozen Russian assets was discussed as part of a comprehensive peace agreement” Read at Meduza ↗
Left · 1European delegates rejected the plan; according to Meduza's summary of the FT, they said they opposed handing control of the assets to anyone and ruled out returning any portion to Moscow. MeduzaLC “they opposed handing control of the assets to anyone and ruled out returning any portion of them to Moscow” Read at Meduza ↗ Centre · 1The initiative reportedly surprised European capitals and Kyiv and raised questions about Washington's approach to pressuring Moscow. Anadolu AgencyN “the initiative had surprised European capitals and Kyiv and raised questions about Washington’s approach to pressuring Moscow” Read at Anadolu Agency ↗ Centre · 1A US official told the FT that use of frozen assets had been discussed as part of a comprehensive peace deal, but that the mechanisms for releasing the funds and deciding how to spend them remained under consideration. Ukrainian officials said the issue had come up in earlier meetings with US counterparts. Anadolu AgencyN “the mechanisms for releasing the funds and determining how they would be spent remained under consideration”“Ukrainian officials involved in the negotiations said the issue had also been discussed with their US counterparts during previous meetings” Read at Anadolu Agency ↗
Right · 1German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said in Brussels on 15 October, ahead of an EU summit, that the assets "are frozen in Europe and they should remain frozen in Europe. This is our business and we are deciding over it" (Reuters, carried by the Straits Times). The Straits TimesRC “Those are assets that are frozen in Europe and they should remain frozen in Europe. This is our business and we are deciding over it,” Read at The Straits Times ↗ Right · 1Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Russia had no information on the reported proposal and did not know how reliable the reports were; Reuters said it could not immediately verify the FT report. The Straits TimesRC “We don't know to what extent these reports are reliable,”“Reuters could not immediately verify the report.” Read at The Straits Times ↗ Left · 1Meduza added a New York Times report that the US had offered Russia three economic incentives for a partial ceasefire, including unfreezing billions of dollars in assets, which Washington saw as an advance incentive rather than a reward. MeduzaLC “Washington viewed the money as an advance incentive for a partial truce, not a reward for its taking effect.” Read at Meduza ↗
Mixed · 2Western countries froze about €260 billion ($302 billion) of Russian sovereign assets in 2022, most held in the EU; Meduza says about €193 billion sits at Belgium's Euroclear, whose income funds a loan of up to €50 billion to Ukraine, and that the EU approved an indefinite freeze in December 2025. Anadolu AgencyN “approximately €260 billion ($302 billion) in Russian sovereign assets in 2022” Read at Anadolu Agency ↗ MeduzaLC “About 193 billion euros of that total is held at the Belgian depositary Euroclear”“In December 2025, the European Union used a special procedure” Read at Meduza ↗ Right · 1Reuters gives different totals: the EU immobilised about €210 billion of Russian central bank assets, about €185 billion of it at Euroclear, and some European nations want the assets disbursed on behalf of Ukraine. The Straits TimesRC “European Union countries immobilised some €210 billion ($235.73 billion) of Russian central bank assets”“Some European nations want the Russian assets to be disbursed on behalf of Ukraine.” Read at The Straits Times ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left1 outlet
- Framing
- Meduza's headline leads with the US plan for Washington control and Europe's rejection, then adds NYT reporting and background on Euroclear and the EU freeze.
- Emphasis
- European refusal, US control of the funds, incentives offered to Russia, and EU legal details.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Does not include the US official's statement that mechanisms remain under consideration or the Ukrainian officials' comment that the issue was discussed before.
- For example
-
“Europeans rejected the plan, the Financial Times’ sources said.” — Meduza
Centre1 outlet
- Framing
- Anadolu presents the FT report as a US effort to restart peace talks, with the US official's response and the wider debate over financing Ukraine.
- Emphasis
- The US official's framing that options are still being considered, and Ukrainian officials saying the topic had come up before.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Omits the Miami date, Euroclear figures, the EU's December 2025 freeze decision and the NYT report on incentives for Russia.
- For example
-
“the mechanisms for releasing the funds and determining how they would be spent remained under consideration” — Anadolu Agency
Right1 outlet
- Framing
- The Straits Times carries Reuters copy that leads with Merz's response that the assets must stay in Europe, treating the FT report as background.
- Emphasis
- European control of the assets, Merz's quote, the Kremlin's doubt about the reports, and EU/Euroclear figures.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Does not include the US official's comment that mechanisms remain under consideration, the Miami date, or the NYT report on incentives for Russia.
- For example
-
“should stay under the region's control, German Chancellor Friedrich Mer” — The Straits Times
What every side reports
- The FT reported, citing four sources, that the US proposed unfreezing some Russian assets and placing them in a US-overseen vehicle.
- Witkoff and Kushner presented the options at Miami talks with Ukraine, France, Germany, the UK, the EU and NATO.
- European delegates rejected the proposal.
- About €260 billion of Russian assets were frozen in 2022.
Where accounts differ
-
Size of the frozen Russian assets
- Left
- Meduza: €260 billion frozen, about €193 billion at Euroclear.
- Centre
- Anadolu: about €260 billion ($302 billion) frozen in 2022, bulk in the EU.
- Right
- Reuters via the Straits Times: about €210 billion immobilised by the EU, about €185 billion at Euroclear.
-
The US proposed that European countries transfer some frozen Russian assets to a financial vehicle overseen by Washington.
Reported- Reports 3
- Meduza, Anadolu Agency, The Straits Times
-
European delegates rejected the US proposal.
Reported- Reports 3
- Meduza, Anadolu Agency, The Straits Times
Steve Witkoff person
Witkoff, with Kushner, reportedly presented several options for releasing the assets.
“presented several possible mechanisms for releasing the assets” — Anadolu Agency
Financial Times organisation
The FT is the source of the report, citing four people briefed on the matter.
“Citing four people briefed on the matter” — Anadolu Agency
Left1 article
-
MeduzaLC ·
Neutral Relays the FT report with emphasis on European rejection and US control, adding NYT and background context.
Centre1 article
-
US floats unfreezing some Russian assets to restart Ukraine peace talks: Report
Neutral Relays the FT report, including the US official's response and Ukrainian comments.

Right1 article
-
The Straits TimesRC · · via Reuters
Merz says frozen Russian assets must stay in Europe amid reported US proposal
Neutral Reuters wire copy led by Merz's insistence the assets stay in Europe, with Kremlin scepticism and an unverified-report caveat.
- 15 Oct 04:20 First Anadolu AgencyN US floats unfreezing some Russian assets to restart Ukraine peace talks: Report
- 15 Oct 09:28 +5h 8m MeduzaLC FT: U.S. proposed unfreezing some Russian assets and placing them under Washington’s control; Europe rejected the plan
- 15 Oct 11:00 +6h 40m The Straits TimesRC Merz says frozen Russian assets must stay in Europe amid reported US proposal via Reuters
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.
Ask about this story
Loading…