Skip to content
Bramble

World

US reportedly proposed unfreezing some Russian assets under US-run vehicle; Europeans refused

The Financial Times reported that US negotiators asked European countries to release part of the frozen Russian sovereign assets into a Washington-overseen vehicle to revive peace talks. European delegates rejected the idea, according to the report.

3 outlets · 1L · 1C · 1R First reported Account updated

Updated (version 2). New coverage since the last version from The Straits Times.

Image: Anadolu Agency
Image: Meduza
Image: The Straits Times

1 / 3

The story, neutrally told

Mixed · 2The Financial Times reported on Wednesday, citing four people briefed on the matter, that the US had proposed European countries unfreeze some Russian sovereign assets and transfer them to a financial vehicle overseen by Washington, to revive peace negotiations over Ukraine. Mixed · 2The proposal was reportedly made by US envoy Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, son-in-law of President Donald Trump, at talks in Miami (Meduza dates them to 9 October) with representatives of Ukraine, France, Germany, the UK, the EU and NATO. Mixed · 2The assets' fate was discussed as part of a comprehensive peace agreement, and the US set out several options, including a new special-purpose vehicle under US oversight.

Left · 1European delegates rejected the plan; according to Meduza's summary of the FT, they said they opposed handing control of the assets to anyone and ruled out returning any portion to Moscow. Centre · 1The initiative reportedly surprised European capitals and Kyiv and raised questions about Washington's approach to pressuring Moscow. Centre · 1A US official told the FT that use of frozen assets had been discussed as part of a comprehensive peace deal, but that the mechanisms for releasing the funds and deciding how to spend them remained under consideration. Ukrainian officials said the issue had come up in earlier meetings with US counterparts.

Right · 1German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said in Brussels on 15 October, ahead of an EU summit, that the assets "are frozen in Europe and they should remain frozen in Europe. This is our business and we are deciding over it" (Reuters, carried by the Straits Times). Right · 1Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Russia had no information on the reported proposal and did not know how reliable the reports were; Reuters said it could not immediately verify the FT report. Left · 1Meduza added a New York Times report that the US had offered Russia three economic incentives for a partial ceasefire, including unfreezing billions of dollars in assets, which Washington saw as an advance incentive rather than a reward.

Mixed · 2Western countries froze about €260 billion ($302 billion) of Russian sovereign assets in 2022, most held in the EU; Meduza says about €193 billion sits at Belgium's Euroclear, whose income funds a loan of up to €50 billion to Ukraine, and that the EU approved an indefinite freeze in December 2025. Right · 1Reuters gives different totals: the EU immobilised about €210 billion of Russian central bank assets, about €185 billion of it at Euroclear, and some European nations want the assets disbursed on behalf of Ukraine.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left1 outlet

Framing
Meduza's headline leads with the US plan for Washington control and Europe's rejection, then adds NYT reporting and background on Euroclear and the EU freeze.
Emphasis
European refusal, US control of the funds, incentives offered to Russia, and EU legal details.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not include the US official's statement that mechanisms remain under consideration or the Ukrainian officials' comment that the issue was discussed before.
For example
“Europeans rejected the plan, the Financial Times’ sources said.” — Meduza

Centre1 outlet

Framing
Anadolu presents the FT report as a US effort to restart peace talks, with the US official's response and the wider debate over financing Ukraine.
Emphasis
The US official's framing that options are still being considered, and Ukrainian officials saying the topic had come up before.
Leaves out or plays down
Omits the Miami date, Euroclear figures, the EU's December 2025 freeze decision and the NYT report on incentives for Russia.
For example
“the mechanisms for releasing the funds and determining how they would be spent remained under consideration” — Anadolu Agency

Right1 outlet

Framing
The Straits Times carries Reuters copy that leads with Merz's response that the assets must stay in Europe, treating the FT report as background.
Emphasis
European control of the assets, Merz's quote, the Kremlin's doubt about the reports, and EU/Euroclear figures.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not include the US official's comment that mechanisms remain under consideration, the Miami date, or the NYT report on incentives for Russia.
For example
“should stay under the region's control, German Chancellor Friedrich Mer” — The Straits Times

Ask about this story

Loading…