Trial nurse with spinal cord damage refused vaccine compensation as not 60% disabled
Marie-Claire Hoyle, who developed transverse myelitis after the Oxford-AstraZeneca trial vaccine in 2020, was refused a payment under the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme because she is no longer judged 60% disabled. She wants the scheme reformed.
1 / 2
The story, neutrally told
Right · 2Marie-Claire Hoyle, a 44-year-old NHS nurse, has been refused compensation under the Government's Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme (VDPS) after developing a spinal cord condition following the Oxford-AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine trial. GB NewsR “has been denied Government compensation, as her condition "no longer meets the required disability threshold".” Read at GB News ↗ Daily MailR “was refused compensation because she was not deemed disabled enough.” Read at Daily Mail ↗ Right · 2She volunteered for the trial while working at the Royal Liverpool University Hospital, and about two weeks after her second dose in August 2020 she developed transverse myelitis, a rare condition in which the spinal cord becomes inflamed. The trial was suspended worldwide while her case was investigated. GB NewsR “developed transverse myelitis, a rare neurological condition that causes inflammation of the spinal cord, just two weeks after receiving her second dose of the vaccine in August 2020.” Read at GB News ↗ Daily MailR “A world-wide shutdown of the trial followed while experts worked to understand the situation and Mrs Hoyle's case.” Read at Daily Mail ↗ Right · 2She says she lost the use of her hands, could not hold a pen or a toothbrush, and was numb from the collarbone to the thigh. Her condition has since improved, but she says an MRI scan showed the damage to her spinal cord will not fully heal. She still has poor grip, nerve pain down her left arm and numbness across her chest. Daily MailR “'I lost the ability to use my hands, I couldn’t hold a pen, I couldn’t hold a toothbrush,' she told the Telegraph.” Read at Daily Mail ↗ GB NewsR “Although she has since recovered much of her mobility, she continues to experience nerve pain, weakness and lasting sensory problems.” Read at GB News ↗
Right · 2The VDPS pays a one-off £120,000 to people who can show a vaccine caused their injury and that they meet a 60 per cent disability threshold. Hoyle's claim was rejected because she is no longer considered at least 60 per cent disabled. GB NewsR “The scheme provides a one-off payment of £120,000 to people who can demonstrate a vaccination caused their injury, and that their disability meets the qualifying threshold.” Read at GB News ↗ Daily MailR “the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme (VDPS) ruled she would not receive compensation because she was not deemed to be 60 per cent disabled.” Read at Daily Mail ↗ Right · 2Hoyle says the authorities accepted that the vaccine caused her condition and that she was seriously harmed at the time, but told her: 'You aren't now, so you don't need the payment.' GB NewsR ““They acknowledged that the vaccine caused my transverse myelitis, based on the evidence I supplied with all my medical records” Read at GB News ↗ Daily MailR “'You aren't now, so you don't need the payment.'” Read at Daily Mail ↗ Right · 1She is calling for the scheme to be reformed. GB News reports that she favours a sliding scale reflecting the continuing impact of an injury, rather than a rigid 60 per cent threshold, so that people are not excluded because their condition improves. GB NewsR “She believes compensation should be calculated on a sliding scale, taking account of the continuing impact of an injury, rather than imposing a rigid 60 per cent disability threshold.” Read at GB News ↗
Right · 2Hoyle separately received a high five-figure sum from Oxford University in an out-of-court settlement. Transverse myelitis was later listed as an extremely rare possible side effect of the vaccine. She remains supportive of vaccination and had her youngest son vaccinated against Covid-19 in 2021. GB NewsR “Mrs Hoyle receiving a high five-figure sum in an out-of-court settlement from Oxford University.” Read at GB News ↗ Daily MailR “took her youngest son for his Covid jab in 2021.” Read at Daily Mail ↗ Right · 2Her case comes as the Government considers recommendations from Baroness Hallett's Covid-19 Inquiry, published last April, on reforming the compensation scheme. GB News says Hallett called for payments to be scaled so people with less debilitating injuries can also be compensated. The Daily Mail says she is working to reduce the payment so more people can be compensated. GB NewsR “Lady Hallett has called for payments to be scaled, so that people with less debilitating injuries can also receive financial reprieval.” Read at GB News ↗ Daily MailR “Lady Hallett is working to reduce that payment so that more people with less debilitating injuries can be compensated.” Read at Daily Mail ↗ Right · 2The NHS Business Services Authority, which administers the VDPS, said rejected claims can be challenged and reassessed using updated medical evidence. The Department of Health and Social Care expressed sympathy and said it is carefully considering the inquiry's recommendations and will respond shortly. AstraZeneca said patient safety is its highest priority. GB NewsR “said rejected claims could be challenged and reassessed using updated medical evidence.” Read at GB News ↗ Daily MailR “We are carefully considering the COVID-19 Inquiry's recommendations on reforming the scheme and will respond shortly.'” Read at Daily Mail ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left0 outlets
No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Centre0 outlets
No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Right2 outlets
- Framing
- Both outlets lead with the 'not disabled enough' quote and treat Hoyle as a vaccine casualty let down by a rigid state scheme, while noting she still supports vaccination.
- Emphasis
- Her personal account of lost hand function and lasting pain, the £120,000 payment and 60 per cent threshold, and her call for reform. The Daily Mail stresses the severity of her injury; GB News adds the DHSC and AstraZeneca responses and notes that she recovered much of her mobility.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Neither outlet quotes an independent expert on how the disability threshold is assessed. Both rely largely on Hoyle's account, and neither explains how the scheme measures disability. The Daily Mail does not say that she recovered much of her mobility.
- Charged language
- “Covid vaccine victim”“struck down”“agonising inflammation”“jab victims”
- For example
-
“A Covid vaccine victim who lost the use of her hands after receiving a jab was refused compensation because she was not deemed disabled enough.” — Daily Mail
“Nurse who was struck down by rare condition linked to Covid vaccine 'not disable enough' for compensation” — GB News
What every side reports
- Hoyle, 44, developed transverse myelitis about two weeks after her second dose in the Oxford-AstraZeneca trial in August 2020.
- Her VDPS claim was refused because she is no longer judged at least 60 per cent disabled.
- The VDPS pays a one-off £120,000.
- She received an out-of-court settlement from Oxford University.
- The Government is considering the Hallett Inquiry's recommendations on reforming the scheme.
Where accounts differ
-
What the Hallett Inquiry recommended on payments
- Right
- GB News: Hallett called for payments to be scaled so people with less debilitating injuries can also be paid. The Daily Mail: Hallett is working to reduce the payment so more people can be compensated.
Marie-Claire Hoyle person
Hoyle says the vaccine was accepted as the cause of her condition but she was refused payment because she has improved. She argues the 60 per cent threshold should give way to a sliding scale, and she remains pro-vaccination.
“She is calling for the scheme to be overhauled, arguing that people who suffer serious vaccine injuries should not be excluded from compensation simply because their condition improves over time.” — GB News
“Vaccines are there for a reason, to help and protect people” — Daily Mail
Oxford-AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine product
AstraZeneca says patient safety is its highest priority. GB News adds that it stressed the benefits of vaccination outweighed the risks of extremely rare side effects.
“Patient safety is our highest priority.” — Daily Mail
“outweighed the risks” — GB News
Left0 articles
No coverage yet.
Centre0 articles
No coverage yet.
Right2 articles
-
GB NewsR ·
Sympathetic Presents Hoyle's rejected claim as a gap in the compensation scheme, with her reform proposal and responses from official bodies and AstraZeneca.

-
Sympathetic Calls Hoyle a 'Covid vaccine victim' who lost the use of her hands, and stresses the severity of her injury and her call for reform.

- 16 Oct 10:27 First GB NewsR Nurse who was struck down by rare condition linked to Covid vaccine 'not disable enough' for compensation
- 16 Oct 10:51 +24m Daily MailR Covid vaccine victim who lost the use of her hands after AstraZeneca jab was 'not disabled enough' for compensation
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.
Ask about this story
Loading…