Judge finds venue owner harassed occupant by starting to remove The Cricketers' roof; £2,000 awarded
A county court judge found that Ravinder Laly harassed Nicola Saia, who was living in the former music venue The Cricketers in Kennington, when agents began removing the roof in July 2023 with Saia inside. Saia, who was held to be a trespasser rather than a tenant, was awarded £2,000.
1 / 2
The story, neutrally told
Mixed · 2A judge has found that Ravinder Laly, owner of The Cricketers at the Oval in Kennington, south London, harassed Nicola Saia by starting to demolish the roof while Saia was asleep inside, and awarded Saia £2,000 in damages. Evening StandardN “He awarded Mr Saia £2,000 damages under his harassment claim.” Read at Evening Standard ↗ Daily MailR “Mr Saia was awarded £2,000 in damages under his harassment claim.” Read at Daily Mail ↗ Mixed · 2The Cricketers, built in the 1860s, was a music venue that hosted acts including The Pogues, Happy Mondays and Fairport Convention before being converted into flats. Daily MailR “The famed venue, built in the 1860s, hosted a slew of high-profile acts including The Pogues, Happy Mondays and the Fairport Convention before being converted into flats.” Read at Daily Mail ↗ Evening StandardN “including The Pogues, Happy Mondays, early reggae pioneer Desmond Dekker and folk rock band, Fairport Convention.” Read at Evening Standard ↗ Mixed · 2Saia had earlier stayed in the building with permission as a property guardian. He told the court the property was unfit to live in but that he had to stay until he could move into temporary accommodation on 29 July 2023, because the council had deemed him homeless. Daily MailR “even though the property was unfit to live in, he had to stay until he could move into temporary accommodation on July 29, 2023, as the council deemed him homeless.” Read at Daily Mail ↗ Evening StandardN “who had formerly stayed in the condemned building with permission as a property guardian” Read at Evening Standard ↗
Mixed · 2Saia said Laly repeatedly threatened from 3 July 2023 that the roof would come down if he did not leave. At about 9am on 18 July 2023 he was woken by loud banging and found debris falling through a hole in his living room ceiling. His barrister, Kevin Brown, said builders had made a hole through the roof and ceiling of the living room, bathroom and one bedroom, with Laly present. Daily MailR “At around 9am on July 18, the squatter was woken to loud banging and later found debris falling through a hole in his living room ceiling.” Read at Daily Mail ↗ Evening StandardN “Mr Laly was in attendance with builders and a hole had been made through the roof/ceiling of the living room, bathroom and one of the bedrooms.” Read at Evening Standard ↗ Mixed · 2Saia sued Laly and his company RSL Slough Ltd for harassment and unlawful eviction, claiming 'shock, stress, anxiety and inconvenience' and seeking up to £60,000. His barrister said he had suffered harm to his mental health and remains traumatised. Laly denied harassment and unlawful eviction and disputed that Saia was legally a tenant. Daily MailR “claiming he suffered 'shock, stress, anxiety and inconvenience' – and demanding up to £60,000 compensation.” Read at Daily Mail ↗ Evening StandardN “Mr Saia has suffered harm and damage to his mental health, and remains traumatised by the experience.” Read at Evening Standard ↗ Mixed · 2Recorder Tom Shepherd accepted Saia's evidence that agents instructed by Laly began removing the roof knowing he was inside. He called this 'unacceptable and oppressive' and 'clearly calculated to cause alarm and distress', and said Laly could have obtained a possession order and used bailiffs, or put up fences or barricades. He said it was the imminence of the threats to demolish that 'stepped over the line'. Evening StandardN “I find that this was unacceptable and oppressive, and was clearly calculated to cause alarm and distress,” Read at Evening Standard ↗ Daily MailR “'It was the imminence of the threats to demolish which I find stepped over the line,' he explained.” Read at Daily Mail ↗
Mixed · 2The judge also found that Laly harassed Saia by briefly cutting off his water. He dismissed claims that cutting the WiFi and boarding up the property to 'trap' Saia amounted to harassment. He found Saia was not a legal tenant, so there was no breach of the Protection from Eviction Act, under which most of the damages claim was made. Daily MailR “He also concluded that Mr Laly harassed Mr Saia by briefly cutting off water to his flat.” Read at Daily Mail ↗ Evening StandardN “there was no breach of the Protection from Eviction Act, under which the bulk of his damages claim was made.” Read at Evening Standard ↗ Mixed · 2Laly's barrister, Ben Leb, said his clients had a 'licence' to enter the property and counter-sued Saia for trespass. The judge found Saia was 'technically a trespasser' but rejected claims of damage by him and awarded nominal damages of £1. The Cricketers was fully demolished in 2024. Evening StandardN “the judge found that he was “technically a trespasser”, but rejected claims for alleged damage done by him, awarding nominal compensation of just £1.” Read at Evening Standard ↗ Daily MailR “The Cricketers were fully demolished in 2024.” Read at Daily Mail ↗
Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.
Left0 outlets
No left outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.
Centre1 outlet
- Framing
- Straight court report led by the damages award, with the judge's reasoning and quotes set out at length.
- Emphasis
- The judge's finding that demolition with Saia inside was oppressive, and the point that being a squatter did not permit such steps.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Does not mention the council's homelessness finding or the 29 July 2023 move-out date.
- Charged language
- “squatter”“oppressive”
- For example
-
“A squatter living in an iconic London music venue has won a damages payout for "harassment" after the owner began demolishing the building while he was asleep in bed inside.” — Evening Standard
Right1 outlet
- Framing
- Frames the case around the oddity of a squatter being rewarded, using scare quotes around 'harassment' and 'tenant' in the headline.
- Emphasis
- Saia's status as a squatter and trespasser, and the amount awarded ('thousands'); also includes his homelessness and the council's finding.
- Leaves out or plays down
- Gives less weight than the Standard to the judge's criticism that Laly could have used bailiffs or a possession order, though it quotes it.
- Charged language
- “Squatter awarded thousands”“'harassment'”“'tenant'”
- For example
-
“Squatter awarded thousands in damages after music venue owner found guilty of 'harassment' for demolishing building while 'tenant' slept in bed” — Daily Mail
What every side reports
- Recorder Tom Shepherd found Ravinder Laly harassed Nicola Saia by carrying out his threat to remove the roof.
- Saia was awarded £2,000 for harassment; Laly's trespass counterclaim got £1 nominal damages.
- Saia was found not to be a legal tenant, so the Protection from Eviction Act claim failed.
- Claims over WiFi and boarding up were dismissed; the brief water cut-off was found to be harassment.
- The Cricketers was fully demolished in 2024.
Where accounts differ
-
How to label Saia
- Centre
- Evening Standard calls him a 'squatter' in the headline and opening, and notes he formerly stayed as a property guardian.
- Right
- Daily Mail calls him a 'squatter' and puts 'tenant' and 'harassment' in scare quotes in the headline.
-
Which court heard the case
- Centre
- Evening Standard says Central London County Court.
- Right
- Daily Mail says London County Court.
Nicola Saia person
Saia says Laly threatened to bring the roof down and then did so while he was inside, causing shock, stress and lasting trauma. He claimed up to £60,000 and won £2,000 on the harassment claim.
“Mr Saia has suffered harm and damage to his mental health, and remains traumatised by the experience.” — Evening Standard
Left0 articles
No coverage yet.
Centre1 article
-
London squatter wins £2,000 damages after landlord began demolition while he was asleep
Neutral Plain report of the ruling and the judge's reasoning, using 'squatter' but quoting the judge's criticism of Laly.

Right1 article
-
Mixed Court report with a headline that casts doubt on the award through scare quotes and the 'squatter' label.

- 16 Oct 10:15 First Daily MailR Squatter awarded thousands in damages after music venue owner found guilty of 'harassment' for demolishing building while 'tenant' slept in bed
- 17 Oct 06:34 +20h 19m Evening StandardN London squatter wins £2,000 damages after landlord began demolition while he was asleep
Times are when each article was published, or when we first saw it if the outlet gave no time.
Ask about this story
Loading…