Skip to content
Bramble

Technology

Voters use AI chatbots to research and compare candidates in 2026 midterms

Some US voters are asking AI chatbots to help research their midterm ballots and even decide how to vote, prompting concern about bias and flattery from the tools.

2 outlets · 1L · 0C · 1R First reported Account updated
Image: Breitbart

The story, neutrally told

Left · 1Some US voters are asking AI chatbots to help research their ballots and even decide who to vote for in the 2026 midterms, NPR reported on 5 October, as early voting was already under way. Right · 1Breitbart, relaying NPR's reporting, described Adam Johnson, a West Virginia voter and illustration student who typically votes Republican but does not support the MAGA movement, spending a September evening asking ChatGPT to compare Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV) with Democratic challenger Rachel Fetty Anderson. Right · 1Breitbart cited Pew Research Center figures that about half of American adults use AI chatbots and roughly 42 percent of those users use them to search for information.

Right · 1In the exchange, ChatGPT said it should not try to manipulate users' political views or tell them how to vote, but could investigate candidates by criteria the user chooses. On immigration it said Capito has supported stronger border enforcement, while less detailed material was available on Fetty Anderson, so it avoided assigning her generic Democratic positions. Right · 1Johnson said ChatGPT is "just kind of a people pleaser" that speaks positively of whatever a user leans towards. Right · 1Rafael Batista, a Johns Hopkins fellow who studies how AI shapes people's experience of the world, said such tendencies can reinforce existing views so users leave more confident without learning more. He suggested hiding personal preferences in prompts and using incognito mode to limit bias from a chatbot's memory.

Right · 1Another voter, Lisa Veldran, 65, of Madison, Wisconsin, used Gemini to compare gubernatorial primary candidates Francesca Hong and David Crowley, and said voters must stay mindful of who owns and builds these tools. Right · 1Breitbart added its own argument that the chatbots are made by "Silicon Valley leftists", citing author Wynton Hall's claim that Google Gemini labelled seven Republican senators, Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio as violating its hate speech policies when he prompted it to assess senators' statements.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left1 outlet

Framing
NPR presents the trend as a new way voters prepare for the election, leading with voters asking AI to research ballots and help decide.
Emphasis
Voters' new habits as early voting begins.
Leaves out or plays down
Little beyond the opening is available to compare.
For example
“some voters are trying something new to get ready for the election: asking AI to help research their ballot” — NPR

Centre0 outlets

No centre outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Right1 outlet

Framing
Breitbart recasts NPR's story as a warning about chatbots built by 'Silicon Valley leftists' and adds a Gemini hate-speech example of alleged bias against Republicans.
Emphasis
Ideological bias of AI companies, sycophancy, and Gemini's treatment of Republicans.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not report any company response to the Gemini claims.
Charged language
“Silicon Valley leftists”“smeared”
For example
“Americans are turning to chatbots created by Silicon Valley leftists to determine how they will vote in the midterm elections.” — Breitbart