Skip to content
Bramble

UK

Hillingdon Council to remove about 700 dog waste bins, saving £160,000 a year

The Conservative-run west London borough of Hillingdon has approved removing all around 700 dedicated dog waste bins, telling owners to use ordinary litter bins. A residents' association has criticised the lack of consultation and of a map of disposal points.

2 outlets · 1L · 1C · 0R First reported Account updated
Image: Evening Standard
Image: Metro

1 / 2

The story, neutrally told

Mixed · 2Hillingdon Council in west London has approved plans to remove all of its roughly 700 dedicated dog waste bins, saying they are no longer necessary. Mixed · 2Residents will be told to put bagged dog waste in standard litter bins or their household rubbish bins, or take it home. Mixed · 2The move is expected to save £160,000 a year, of which £60,000 is earmarked for street cleaning and extra litter bin servicing.

Mixed · 2The council says many dedicated bins are already near ordinary public bins and that existing waste services can absorb the change; Metro reports that the 14.5 tonnes of dog waste collected each month can be handled by general waste bins, while the Evening Standard cites more than 170 tonnes collected a year. Mixed · 2Officers considered keeping the bins or removing only those near litter bins, but rejected both because a separate collection service would still be needed; a council officer called removal "the most effective and efficient option available to the council". Centre · 1The bins will be removed in phases. Stickers reading "I can take dog waste too" will go on litter bins, particularly in parks and popular dog-walking spots, along with temporary signage.

Mixed · 2The council's report acknowledged a risk of more dog fouling but said it could be managed through signs, public information campaigns and enforcement. Left · 1The Ruislip Residents' Association warned that some dog bins already overflow, criticised the council for not publishing a list or map of disposal points, and objected that the decision was approved without formal public consultation, according to Metro.

Every sentence links to the reporting it rests on. The pill in front of each says where its sources sit: Left, Centre or Right when one side supplies at least half of them, Mixed when they are evenly split. The number is how many outlets it cites.

Left1 outlet

Framing
Reports the plan and then focuses on concerns about more dog mess and the lack of consultation.
Emphasis
Residents' association criticism, overflowing bins, no published map, no formal consultation.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not give the annual tonnage figure or the officer's full justification.
For example
“However, the plan has raised concerns about whether it could lead to more dog mess being left on pavements and in parks.” — Metro

Centre1 outlet

Framing
Reports the council's decision and rationale, led by the saving and the volume of waste collected.
Emphasis
The £160,000 saving, the officer's justification and the sticker campaign.
Leaves out or plays down
Does not include criticism from residents or mention the lack of consultation.
For example
“despite over 170 tonnes of dog waste collected in the borough each year.” — Evening Standard

Right0 outlets

No right outlet in our sources has covered this story yet.

Ask about this story

Loading…